Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12358
Return-Path: <sterling@apache.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 34807 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Aug 2004 04:45:31 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 31091 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 04:44:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mbobo.org) (213.133.123.182)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 04:44:47 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.mbobo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A4645748C2; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.mbobo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (debian [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 32181-08; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:44:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.200.1.55] (adsl-68-120-96-254.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [68.120.96.254])
	by mail.mbobo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1A5775748BE; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:44:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <412D6AE0.8070305@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:45:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Daniel C." <dcrookston@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@php.net>,
	"Naik, Roshan" <roshan.naik@hp.com>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <C043E4034185BB40B01C76980AC639C066F1D0@cacexc04.americas.cpqcorp.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408251736140.1308@t42p> <7730d1c90408252127269d0f43@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7730d1c90408252127269d0f43@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at mbobo.org
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unfulfilled promises... forever experimental extensions...
 all over again
From: sterling@apache.org (Sterling Hughes)

Both you and roshan are more than welcome, if not encouraged, to stop 
posting if you find us childish, immature and generally "uncool dude."  
We apologize for our inferiority, we really wish we had something better 
to do than respond to your mails.

-Sterling

>Here we have a polite, if provocative, email, and two very nasty and
>rude responses to it.  Followed by a polite response from Roshan.  If
>you walk into a room and see an argument where one side is yelling and
>being rude, and one person is responding calmly and politely, who
>would you automatically (given no other information) assume is right?
>
>Just a thought from an outside observer.
>Dan
>
>  
>
>>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Naik, Roshan wrote:
>>    
>>
><snip Roshan's thoughtful and polite email>
>
>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:42:11 -0700 (PDT), Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@php.net> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Wow, that was quite a rant from someone who hasn't contributed a damn
>>thing.
>>Ranting at a bunch of volunteers is utterly useless and counterproductive.
>>If you do that, your words might mean something.
>>    
>>
>
>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:06:32 -0700, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Thanks for this quite useless and unproductive email.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>