Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:123415
Feedback-ID: ifab94697:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-480-g515a2f54a-fm-20240515.001-g515a2f54
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c4385a67-b86c-461d-9797-6d76b35dff8a@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1142fd03-a71a-3a6e-2cda-540c2ab5961a@php.net>
References: <1142fd03-a71a-3a6e-2cda-540c2ab5961a@php.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 17:25:37 +0200
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Subject Prefixes
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary=121eb6467ba9404c91e2fde737999ee4
From: rob@bottled.codes ("Rob Landers")

--121eb6467ba9404c91e2fde737999ee4
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 23, 2024, at 16:50, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
> I've noticed that lately, people are adding a [Discussion] prefix to n=
ew=20
> threads to this list. That seems rather superfluous, as this is a=20
> *discussion* mailing list.
>=20
> RFCs require us to use [RFC] and [Vote] to stand out, but please let u=
s=20
> proliferate additional ones.
>=20
> The normal subject text should be enough.
>=20
> This is more useful where display space (like on phones) is small, so=20
> the subject is more easily seen.
>=20
> cheers,
> Derick
>=20

I rather like the discussion prefix. It seems to be used when people are=
 considering an RFC and feeling things out.=20

=E2=80=94 Rob
--121eb6467ba9404c91e2fde737999ee4
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type=3D"text/css">p.Mso=
Normal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div>On Thu, May 23,=
 2024, at 16:50, Derick Rethans wrote:<br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite=
" id=3D"qt" style=3D""><div>Hi!<br></div><div><br></div><div>I've notice=
d that lately, people are adding a [Discussion] prefix to new&nbsp;<br><=
/div><div>threads to this list. That seems rather superfluous, as this i=
s a&nbsp;<br></div><div>*discussion* mailing list.<br></div><div><br></d=
iv><div>RFCs require us to use [RFC] and [Vote] to stand out, but please=
 let us&nbsp;<br></div><div>proliferate additional ones.<br></div><div><=
br></div><div>The normal subject text should be enough.<br></div><div><b=
r></div><div>This is more useful where display space (like on phones) is=
 small, so&nbsp;<br></div><div>the subject is more easily seen.<br></div=
><div><br></div><div>cheers,<br></div><div>Derick<br></div><div><br></di=
v></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I rather like the discussion prefix. =
It seems to be used when people are considering an RFC and feeling thing=
s out.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div id=3D"sig121229152">=E2=80=94 Rob<=
br></div></body></html>
--121eb6467ba9404c91e2fde737999ee4--