Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:122502
Feedback-ID: ifab94697:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-153-g7e3bb84806-fm-20240215.007-g7e3bb848
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e11692cb-0aa3-4b1a-ad46-bb79b61c84e0@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a427939-f244-4ea1-922b-09de7728299f@rwec.co.uk>
References: <112488a9-aaa6-4d85-9056-a4581a3cda21@app.fastmail.com>
 <17d50791-190d-4f74-9478-030a84ae9545@app.fastmail.com>
 <3b312b96-41e0-42af-b2c6-cc75f27102e8@app.fastmail.com>
 <8a427939-f244-4ea1-922b-09de7728299f@rwec.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:07:15 +0100
To: "Rowan Tommins" <rowan@rwec.co.uk>, internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] is this thing on?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary=c7f461ef43564dcbb19246cc4da04e57
From: rob@bottled.codes ("Rob Landers")

--c7f461ef43564dcbb19246cc4da04e57
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, at 19:01, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> On 26/02/2024 16:14, Rob Landers wrote:
> > There wasn=E2=80=99t any mention about issues FROM Gmail TO the list=
. I sent=20
> > this email because it didn=E2=80=99t seem like ANYONE was aware of t=
he issue=20
> > (otherwise someone would have mentioned it, so people would stop=20
> > hammering the server trying to send emails that couldn=E2=80=99t be =
sent).=20
> > Even emailing people like Derrick directly was failing to be sent.=20
>=20
>=20
> Absolutely, it wasn't my intention to criticise you for asking, just t=
o=20
> reassure you that it is a known issue - I only know myself because I=20
> reached out on a different forum, and was reassured in my turn.
>=20
> The mention of the other problems was just in case you hadn't spotted=20
> that thread.

Oh no worries! I=E2=80=99m just glad people know that they know.

>=20
> Hopefully all will be resolved soon, and we can get back to our=20
> regularly scheduled bikeshedding ;)

Looking forward to it! I have a very long question I sent to the list a =
few minutes after it broke, mostly about a bug with traits that has been=
 fixed and broken at least once and I=E2=80=99m not sure if it is intent=
ionally broken. I can open a PR to fix it, but if it=E2=80=99s intention=
ally broken and needs an RFC to fix, it probably won=E2=80=99t happen (a=
t least by me).

> Regards,
>=20
> --=20
> Rowan Tommins
> [IMSoP]
>=20
>=20

=E2=80=94 Rob
--c7f461ef43564dcbb19246cc4da04e57
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type=3D"text/css">p.Mso=
Normal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div>On Mon, Feb 26,=
 2024, at 19:01, Rowan Tommins wrote:<br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"=
 id=3D"qt" style=3D""><div>On 26/02/2024 16:14, Rob Landers wrote:<br></=
div><div>&gt; There wasn=E2=80=99t any mention about issues FROM Gmail T=
O the list. I sent&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; this email because it didn=E2=
=80=99t seem like ANYONE was aware of the issue&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt;=
 (otherwise someone would have mentioned it, so people would stop&nbsp;<=
br></div><div>&gt; hammering the server trying to send emails that could=
n=E2=80=99t be sent).&nbsp;<br></div><div>&gt; Even emailing people like=
 Derrick directly was failing to be sent.&nbsp;<br></div><div><br></div>=
<div><br></div><div>Absolutely, it wasn't my intention to criticise you =
for asking, just to&nbsp;<br></div><div>reassure you that it is a known =
issue - I only know myself because I&nbsp;<br></div><div>reached out on =
a different forum, and was reassured in my turn.<br></div><div><br></div=
><div>The mention of the other problems was just in case you hadn't spot=
ted&nbsp;<br></div><div>that thread.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></di=
v><div>Oh no worries! I=E2=80=99m just glad people know that they know.<=
/div><div><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite" id=3D"qt" style=3D""><div>=
<br></div><div>Hopefully all will be resolved soon, and we can get back =
to our&nbsp;<br></div><div>regularly scheduled bikeshedding ;)<br></div>=
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Looking forward to it! I have a very lo=
ng question I sent to the list a few minutes after it broke, mostly abou=
t a bug with traits that has been fixed and broken at least once and I=E2=
=80=99m not sure if it is intentionally broken. I can open a PR to fix i=
t, but if it=E2=80=99s intentionally broken and needs an RFC to fix, it =
probably won=E2=80=99t happen (at least by me).</div><div><br></div><blo=
ckquote type=3D"cite" id=3D"qt" style=3D""><div>Regards,<br></div><div><=
br></div><div>--&nbsp;<br></div><div>Rowan Tommins<br></div><div>[IMSoP]=
<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div=
 id=3D"sig121229152">=E2=80=94 Rob<br></div></body></html>
--c7f461ef43564dcbb19246cc4da04e57--