Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:122311
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEPPVa3JWXGLZh9rEE7WGa+nbbfFr-Lv4B7TX4F2TX3OSw6K+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANS-=pcRFH=1y8O6N-R2Ty_Y-xid_i6NM05BPcnKGEdPBhTi_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANLbj-pYFZj5M+A9=kQW9JobnM7ip0s6FqXA5z5qew6QGRDpfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEPPVa35rq3=UatBKNKNz9aH=FAcc5Fv3yXtUx-b-+uc8W-ppQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <29b0a205-8903-4ae8-b1e4-45db846fee7f@wikimedia.org> <CAEPPVa3t3E4_BuZR3-hsBOYuoNnc7gPidg4umD9Vvyg2vg=wjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <65C272A0.8060709@adviesenzo.nl>
In-Reply-To: <65C272A0.8060709@adviesenzo.nl>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 04:49:25 +0900
Message-ID: <CAEPPVa1L3U9MaZ16Yeo9Vo6HP0dGhAeCi6--jApRfA1HSr7vPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
From: youkidearitai@gmail.com (youkidearitai)

2024=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=887=E6=97=A5(=E6=B0=B4) 2:56 Juliette Reinders Folmer =
<php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>:
>
> On 6-2-2024 3:40, youkidearitai wrote:
> > 2024=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=886=E6=97=A5(=E7=81=AB) 8:33 Tim Starling <tstarli=
ng@wikimedia.org>:
> >> On 2/2/24 20:27, youkidearitai wrote:
> >>
> >> I see. I'll change mb_ucfirst using titlecase.
> >>
> >> Per my comments a month ago on the GitHub issue , I think it is much b=
etter to use title case for mb_ucfirst() than to use upper case, since conv=
ersion of the first character to upper case has the effect of corrupting te=
xt in the Georgian script, and initial lower-case ligatures are converted t=
o a form which appears like two upper case letters. So I'm pleased to see t=
his change to the PR.
> >>
> >> I would appreciate it if the RFC could also be updated to include this=
 detail, since my vote depends on whether title case or upper case will be =
used.
> >>
> >> -- Tim Starling
> > Hi, Tim
> >
> > Thank you for your comment.
> > I modified to "uses unicode case title" in an RFC.
> >
> > Regards
> > Yuya
> >
>
> Help me out here, but doesn't changing what is actually proposed in an
> RFC **after** the vote has started invalidate the vote ?
>
> Shouldn't the vote be closed/withdrawn and restarted in that case ?

Hi, Internals.

Juliette, Thank you for pointing.
I'm mistake.

I checked the following and it was exactly as I said.
https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting

> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must no=
t be changed during the vote.

I broke this rule. In this case, should I return to "Under discussion"?
I apologize to those who voted, admitting lack of discussion, I want
to reorganize.

Regards
Yuya

--=20
---------------------------
Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
- https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
- https://github.com/youkidearitai
-----------------------------