Newsgroups: php.internals,php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:122307 php.internals:122308
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAEPPVa3JWXGLZh9rEE7WGa+nbbfFr-Lv4B7TX4F2TX3OSw6K+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANS-=pcRFH=1y8O6N-R2Ty_Y-xid_i6NM05BPcnKGEdPBhTi_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANLbj-pYFZj5M+A9=kQW9JobnM7ip0s6FqXA5z5qew6QGRDpfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEPPVa35rq3=UatBKNKNz9aH=FAcc5Fv3yXtUx-b-+uc8W-ppQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <29b0a205-8903-4ae8-b1e4-45db846fee7f@wikimedia.org>
 <CAEPPVa3t3E4_BuZR3-hsBOYuoNnc7gPidg4umD9Vvyg2vg=wjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <65C272A0.8060709@adviesenzo.nl>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:55:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEPPVa3t3E4_BuZR3-hsBOYuoNnc7gPidg4umD9Vvyg2vg=wjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030507060303090802010604"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
From: php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl (Juliette Reinders Folmer)

--------------030507060303090802010604
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 6-2-2024 3:40, youkidearitai wrote:
> 2024年2月6日(火) 8:33 Tim Starling <tstarling@wikimedia.org>:
>> On 2/2/24 20:27, youkidearitai wrote:
>>
>> I see. I'll change mb_ucfirst using titlecase.
>>
>> Per my comments a month ago on the GitHub issue , I think it is much better to use title case for mb_ucfirst() than to use upper case, since conversion of the first character to upper case has the effect of corrupting text in the Georgian script, and initial lower-case ligatures are converted to a form which appears like two upper case letters. So I'm pleased to see this change to the PR.
>>
>> I would appreciate it if the RFC could also be updated to include this detail, since my vote depends on whether title case or upper case will be used.
>>
>> -- Tim Starling
> Hi, Tim
>
> Thank you for your comment.
> I modified to "uses unicode case title" in an RFC.
>
> Regards
> Yuya
>

Help me out here, but doesn't changing what is actually proposed in an 
RFC **after** the vote has started invalidate the vote ?

Shouldn't the vote be closed/withdrawn and restarted in that case ?

--------------030507060303090802010604--