Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:122096 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12563 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2024 13:49:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2024 13:49:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=php.net; s=mail; t=1704289799; bh=MLlvJjZQglaToteMGNhNKu6ouSDCJW5UYDf3b8JwI2M=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=NpJO/f5N8klm6jlKKlfuAQX4HZtE0AQAC7QccMssd2R9Z8U+Nz11P/MElWvGhleQD a0Olf7rUq594qFXFDX9SuLTc4FzCYAhUYhmc7lrcwMeDnhnnOGegJyqVMV0dspk/Oz O+mO+CPlUvEyvNgJanJw0ocJ53MGXmxe5hioWI+gbOnSFjW5dsk4lVnArC0EGY3Caw B4ngRk8rQ4X3KH3nFxX61c/fPr4Fp6Psa2IrMMb0GMREm98e6KWIsBiWeFIMKUPudQ h90AGYW3qAjN2IRdrRm1bqtvkW3CsFrKPh+u5JBRtuyHV75rCXsdWaWDXkPQ3VNMlC i1BGs6UMBw0sQ== Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BA1180054 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pl1-f180.google.com (mail-pl1-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d40eec5e12so72966935ad.1 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:49:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704289762; x=1704894562; darn=lists.php.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MLlvJjZQglaToteMGNhNKu6ouSDCJW5UYDf3b8JwI2M=; b=G6cI5Rol5ukteQvgZ0HFvHPfCIG1O7KdwQMwoCoNiJ7zl13OaUuBeJwm7BqAVIJ3Jv fG8ot+zPaNCk0qAVTiYfFv+7Y1QuGD0MiG08xi+Oq/cAnEK0e1Mzyw1Tl1kX5xlknAvt fa8FAnVKRUXiQBmy5u9HwUafHbGWNNLaPyh8opzvu1s3p++7wcWZVV7a5tRNFqDyDfDl yWujK6CGfRzv83gWMujLO26pWa/ch2Vy6j8YHVm9eHC5oW8IGlvkTjEiAeoQG9rFFvsh fcTJrVCqfVpL7eUFwz584ylhyOoy8aINmPRvkMemLcRTsutsy9z0s9E6jH+MvzJxmaHP Y2zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704289762; x=1704894562; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MLlvJjZQglaToteMGNhNKu6ouSDCJW5UYDf3b8JwI2M=; b=sPuiS0dQUlGDChVa5rnRJdGR3posQuwGRbbJ4C6u3ecvgFx2Yta+xavkZ4FQX58O7O k9PPgDT8UyDNZns3v+IaM7T9OXK7BJVIXv3EqAZvjaUl+o0gN9F1L7j885Il421n/uu7 jbFWhTu+H2+9zQPy1pbpA8o56FscgdknCjLTGmLHfBr574uDuZLcLx6hPfUfX9JlYFIc 4iMsYSrCeWd+V19/p95x+f+t3oxmuAdF8mRY9PCznkdBjwIwNFz7zManpbTDpem0n7rg +LcpHXRsOUdUBUFlDqBKL5x+z0jp7Ayt3Oi6qE2c8f6gh59FP6ENuH60+39kq4n6sXie pUng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyyEYv1o5xB4SIVDsNRjtJhB9V5QSsd5xupeBgyq2OzTXCAFNU8 Mu2FczPQ8+6AZknZmFjOzzXB5Bwsp8HhQ/e56aeednnUY1buDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8YJXbXC1mPLB8CSJz6seHbMFjoXmjjd7eLHVJvRt7P69kR4tZTl7Vd01wdGqj2SOzLI6Ff33FPwrgYdLeNM8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ce14:b0:28c:1eff:ac45 with SMTP id f20-20020a17090ace1400b0028c1effac45mr8525738pju.77.1704289762533; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:49:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:49:11 +0000 Message-ID: To: Max Semenik Cc: Nicolas Grekas , Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e3e687060e0ae1ca" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] NotSerializable attribute From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.") --000000000000e3e687060e0ae1ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 13:17, Max Semenik wrote: > > this actively prevents writing a child class that'd make a parent > serializable if it wants to. > > Wouldn't this violate LSP? > No it doesn't. Making a child class unserializable if the parent is serializable however is violating LSP, and probably a test should be added for this. Best regards, Gina P. Banyard --000000000000e3e687060e0ae1ca--