Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121891
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPTD5yFw3o_dnCzEF+BT3MJNGGtGMDJS35uqzsHq3OX0uGeF9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMT4NpdD7N04UCkLeEJiH=NtSGMDjBAGzDccyycXfuWMRNEaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPFaMJS8aYR0PtXS5EnJ0roT8z8bHSe5AshRFxP=E2xowbaAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTD5yEX9UN2y9AURNLYQGxKgqvsnoHsf16YWfwTs5xzuE0AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTD5yGQobQJy1p1kiQmdiwezD=XaqZbq7gzYmUpHkPTaX4u4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEKnhAE7SyqAPU6BXQQO7evSCvNpVSE5=TA97BCDGbnTp=atQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPFaMKqhJ9AnF7w+UDpgnYDLQiga=95f_Nxa4C4TB2XXeK1zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEKnhAFSWtAF2aQ5S25q3dTY8-6C66yTjaqAU5_JWupJ=Z2J3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEKnhAFSWtAF2aQ5S25q3dTY8-6C66yTjaqAU5_JWupJ=Z2J3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:40:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFPFaMLArWeLme8fd47zDx_Xz9SAHYuZH+Sq=ckxXQnfWoOvNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net>
Cc: Jorg Sowa <jorg.sowa@gmail.com>, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000148290060b6f8e43"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Add 4 new rounding modes to round() function
From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.")

--000000000000148290060b6f8e43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 09:35, Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:28=E2=80=AFAM G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 23:45, Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:13=E2=80=AFPM Jorg Sowa <jorg.sowa@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Creating aliases for Intl extension constants has been accepted with 1=
0
>>>> votes yes and 6 votes no.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This means that it is declined as you need 2/3 of votes to pass...
>>>
>>
>> This seems to be a secondary vote which only requires 50% of votes to be
>> accepted.
>>
>>
> Ah I see now. It's a bit strange to have a secondary vote about sort of
> unrelated thing in different extension but no one objected before or duri=
ng
> the vote so let's keep it accepted.
>

I think so, however, I do agree that this was unclear, and we probably
should make sure future RFCs explicitly state if a vote is primary or not
and what the approval rate for the vote to be accepted should be.

Best regards,

Gina P. Banyard

--000000000000148290060b6f8e43--