Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121871 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70106 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2023 08:40:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2023 08:40:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D10818002F for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:40:08 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com (mail-ua1-f48.google.com [209.85.222.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7c500dcdd7dso209916241.1 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:39:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701333595; x=1701938395; darn=lists.php.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GMqulan/RbQY4OPCUgCkZtl0LSstWe1et06JcQSXSSw=; b=feF68UzgYELnfvCpDiiv/fBhcZQyPFaRvLDeq3TyhtQlSDelNrSQ4fkzibPu5B54U6 Hf5JIg2BAjsUUcSIXAu0bG8wm8OdMP9miQGpcwlNvfxf1q2mFNyt02bbXKmScgQmQwMP l6II/BwymO8A5Nz+qhuJNblui7iiWg/TWEj+3+0ENtOk09brvhQJfI7iCAdqvDSMMSjy ESgRnp8dLgb2nJBa7oOi5542SVgpx2yYPsS3Y7ZHtRev07hfmMcQsmKWfOHbsXgMBirz mNxNRUqEvkjGYt9D6Agm4Lgghr6maMaP+03skSJE2ezdtaeevR2xiWGH0tTJAbi5K4eG hK4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701333595; x=1701938395; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GMqulan/RbQY4OPCUgCkZtl0LSstWe1et06JcQSXSSw=; b=o6C7rGBBUPRj90VGVbBoESO18EfJnCHkcqjcp+BBROqX7hiBvCy/JH5glaIxGPvmwP pvVNlgwEdtBX8LoF3cwL1kjjQVWNRweN10R/mSWtyW3wRlgu5RONW9YaYWFO3h1JKvBB H4aLZVxaYcBd9el5NzAkQ2jE3j4ZfG8d3Wseedlv7m1m1SkQyWRPBuJtOFC3qrO+vCQb YyHD8RVAhK5RzqCcUhhuESAgFWtL7EDIHp4FH4l1AFLTFoQl/1T/IHjw9jhF7o19YvwB abK7otRRTk9P5PaKeGbk2OVsQ0fHc38bsQetaAgi07iIPvjcDnOPwxT3fMcQbtUZJBan rVoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4ZXGzDYWkOBV3LKKh5J6j0czuNvviWD5Q2RYBj6lq5Im7gwrT HZvV0WD85zVapXeKrECmpIjJVNZyOVgrm+d38zsw+dXHsVk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFB1yvSKBnOXNvuVfZ9EVtb7Ai3zMZKfjKE1+lvjNF8sjp8qsVY81CP7NnJ/Obd8sG7vCzY9l9juWOBnGy/+CM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:c8c5:0:b0:4b2:8a1f:6bf3 with SMTP id y188-20020a1fc8c5000000b004b28a1f6bf3mr3615039vkf.8.1701333595573; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:39:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8e77ac89-b8dd-4991-b859-943d34592f5d@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: james@asgrim.com Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:39:44 +0000 Message-ID: To: Andreas Heigl Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009bd29a060b5a98b0" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding a donate link to the PHP website From: titcumbjames@gmail.com (James Titcumb) --0000000000009bd29a060b5a98b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 07:28, Andreas Heigl wrote: > > I would even support an RFC that goes one step beyond that and not only > officially recognize the PHPFoundation as a sponsoring organization but > also transfers the Copyright on PHP from the ominous "PHP Group" to the > PHP Foundation. > I'm tending to agree with you here. The PHP Foundation has proven itself as a valuable organisation. As long as it doesn't go the way of PHP-FIG with so much bureaucracy, rules, and processes, I would support this movement. > > I suppose that is actually nothing that an RFC can do as I imagine that > everyone from the PHP Group needs to support this and even an RFC > wouldn't legally be able to change anything in regards to that. > Surely, everyone who has contributed (i.e. has voting karma) has the opportunity to vote, and therefore, if they choose not to vote, that is surely their choice. I don't know the ins and outs of it, but I'd have thought an RFC, well advertised, with plenty of time to ensure as many people can vote who have rights to. Just my 2 cents, I don't often post on the internals list, but this would be a monumental change. --0000000000009bd29a060b5a98b0--