Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12181
Return-Path: <bjori@jeshus.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77941 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2004 04:20:27 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77809 invoked by uid 1007); 16 Aug 2004 04:20:27 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:20:40 +0200
Message-ID: <20040816062040.674f359a.bjori@jeshus.com>
References: <20040816053546.62ac4a35.bjori@jeshus.com>
	<20040816035655.6169.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
Organization: Jeshus
X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040622 (GTK+ 2.4.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Posted-By: 62.249.185.14
Subject: Re: file()+strip_tags() Vs. fgetss(). huge diffrence normal?
From: bjori@jeshus.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:56:42 -0700
pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) wrote:

> Look at the lines that differ.  strip_tags() doesn't know anything about
> tags that started on previous lines.
Ahhh! noticed now. Thx. :)
> 
> 
> "Hannes Magnusson" <bjori@jeshus.com> wrote in message
> news:20040816053546.62ac4a35.bjori@jeshus.com...
> > Hibb.
> >
> > Is there suppost to be such a huge diffrence between these two methods?
> > Would have thougt combination of file() & strip_tags() would result in
> same results as fgetss()
> > <?php
> >     $file = file ( "http://no2.php.net/" );
> >     $fp = fopen ( "http://no.php.net/", "r" );
> >     $i = 0;
> >
> >     while ( !feof ( $fp ) ) {
> >         echo "fgetss:     "; var_dump ( trim ( fgetss ( $fp, 3072 ) ) );
> >         echo "strip_tags: "; var_dump ( trim ( strip_tags ( $file[
> $i++ ] ) ) ) ;
> >     }
> > ?>
> > See live example: http://62.249.185.14/examples/fgetss.php
> >
> > - Hannes