Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12180
Return-Path: <pollita@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 6216 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2004 03:56:56 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 6170 invoked by uid 1007); 16 Aug 2004 03:56:56 -0000
Message-ID: <20040816035655.6169.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <20040816053546.62ac4a35.bjori@jeshus.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:56:42 -0700
Lines: 27
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Posted-By: 64.142.6.231
Subject: Re: file()+strip_tags() Vs. fgetss(). huge diffrence normal?
From: pollita@php.net ("Sara Golemon")

Look at the lines that differ.  strip_tags() doesn't know anything about
tags that started on previous lines.


"Hannes Magnusson" <bjori@jeshus.com> wrote in message
news:20040816053546.62ac4a35.bjori@jeshus.com...
> Hibb.
>
> Is there suppost to be such a huge diffrence between these two methods?
> Would have thougt combination of file() & strip_tags() would result in
same results as fgetss()
> <?php
>     $file = file ( "http://no2.php.net/" );
>     $fp = fopen ( "http://no.php.net/", "r" );
>     $i = 0;
>
>     while ( !feof ( $fp ) ) {
>         echo "fgetss:     "; var_dump ( trim ( fgetss ( $fp, 3072 ) ) );
>         echo "strip_tags: "; var_dump ( trim ( strip_tags ( $file[
$i++ ] ) ) ) ;
>     }
> ?>
> See live example: http://62.249.185.14/examples/fgetss.php
>
> - Hannes