Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121761
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOWwgpnQvKYvx9UhtZDSBhP4Sq9V65ccxdqGUzTfm5-J+6Znsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOWwgpnQvKYvx9UhtZDSBhP4Sq9V65ccxdqGUzTfm5-J+6Znsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:30:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOWwgp=cKa+CdWOLML3EBwepFBQGMJv6mkyybTDdHOK4ocf3VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dbc455060ac1e90a"
Subject: Re: [RFC] Pass Scope to Magic Accessors
From: nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com (Nicolas Grekas)

--000000000000dbc455060ac1e90a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi all,

Ilija and I would like to start a discussion about the following RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pass_scope_to_magic_accessors
>
> When using magic methods to access actual properties, respecting their
> declared visibility is often desired. Yet, accessing the calling scope to
> emulate the visibility restrictions is unreasonably difficult at the
> moment. This RFC proposes to pass the calling scope to magic accessors to
> make it trivial to get it.
>

Just a quick heads up on this thread to let you know that I'm withdrawing
the RFC.
I'm working with Arnaud Le Blanc on a native implementation of lazy objects
and I don't need fast access to the calling scope for any other use case.
If anyone has, feel free to follow up, but on my side I'm going to focus on
that new soon-to-be RFC for lazy objects. Stay tuned :)

Even if I'm withdrawing, I'm sending a Big Thank You to Ilija for writing
the prototype implementation.
Also thank you to everybody who took some time to review the proposal!

Cheers,
Nicolas

--000000000000dbc455060ac1e90a--