Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121713 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84785 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2023 16:01:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2023 16:01:56 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3155418002F for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:01:57 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,DMARC_PASS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from sender3-of-o58.zoho.com (sender3-of-o58.zoho.com [136.143.184.58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:01:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700323312; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Ufj2ZlBcB8cBJBFalxVvPAeklMljdXqHzMq3uUQBDXiZIK40gAp7U3JAPPBv0ddVh7NRmdci87M/h2RGwQN05nczRK13XCnbm5YPpo5IoxA9U+QAB7qjn9WQlbPCKq96keHhjoKB9mq/1M15U/UVDYXmR2ORj6gvwyA2xgXFqO4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1700323312; h=Content-Type:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=6cI5mSK6JzUdhcIaqw9Dt+pkCH91WkRqe2YCZdjL69Q=; b=EVorLiGhRupQoMqyozVd3/4Z3J9XJg0eqqSSYgS8mYnqhaFsjaB5i75k+QjjAoHGQLGZDALZ2QjwXFvaoxgk+1SHbz3NC5mv03AXLMVNJJCek40aTM8M/+Q/9SXJM15aQb/jBzqTTB3EDEXaLqSV2MwLgdF2ivpp/z0n2Rfrsdw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=daniil.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=daniil@daniil.it; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1700323312; s=daniil; d=daniil.it; i=daniil@daniil.it; h=Date:Date:From:From:To:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=6cI5mSK6JzUdhcIaqw9Dt+pkCH91WkRqe2YCZdjL69Q=; b=L+2r0wPANfudkMEqUNiZWCpbyS4hSzU+xtTBuw31ui5m9M1yiT+a0P12pnW6cnKU K9CT0vIQBSNT8mjzYL+5zCj6ErSRlJO21zTgXcp/6UuFqv/FH0n+1S1Q5W/7TTHlVAU WVyJWKBi5CBRez4T1cFPE2EpZpK1Yk84Gq6EXr+c= Received: from dummy.faircode.eu (128.116.205.77 [128.116.205.77]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1700323310406461.349753970748; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:01:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:01:48 +0100 (GMT+01:00) To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <0112013e-e5ad-4177-992a-4c437f2d13ed@daniil.it> In-Reply-To: References: <06e7cf8c-c5f5-4fb8-b9fe-92b441a70485@daniil.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1_179803343.1700323308175" X-Correlation-ID: <0112013e-e5ad-4177-992a-4c437f2d13ed@daniil.it> X-ZohoMailClient: External Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Final anonymous classes From: daniil@daniil.it ------=_Part_1_179803343.1700323308175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, > While I'm open to Proposal 1, which introduces final anonymous classes > without breaking BC, Proposals 2 and 3 are a different story. > In summary, I advocate for the RFC to focus on the non-BC-breaking option. > Let's maintain our commitment to stability and gradual evolution in PHP. Agree with your points, just adding final anonymous classes seems the best solution to me, but given the interest in alternative solutions both in the pull request discussion, and in the previous mailing list thread, I think I'll leave the other options in the RFC, to see how the votes will go (I'm actually curious myself :). Regards, Daniil Gentili. ------=_Part_1_179803343.1700323308175--