Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121698
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH5C8xX5Wzbm1eerFJJ5hCZdUU8rci8NhBwkSwprRKAG531G7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH5C8xX5Wzbm1eerFJJ5hCZdUU8rci8NhBwkSwprRKAG531G7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 16:13:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEKnhAFDYiPoKwjj2J6akEaZ6WgHkaYia9su_fNQGSKidCt=aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?= <kocsismate90@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c9235060a474ee1"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Resource to object conversion
From: bukka@php.net (Jakub Zelenka)

--0000000000002c9235060a474ee1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 4:48=E2=80=AFPM M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis <kocsismate90=
@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Internals,
>
> Following my straw poll about the Process resource name, I would like to
> present an RFC which clarifies the rough timeline and the BC promises of
> the "resource to object conversion" project.
>
> Link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/resource_to_object_conversion
>
>
Please could you add a separate vote for primary streams if the resource to
object conversion should be done at all (requiring 2/3 votes to be
accepted). I will personally vote against this if there is no is_resource
change as I think it's just too big BC break even for 9.0 - it will likely
require massive update of many code bases.

Cheers

Jakub

--0000000000002c9235060a474ee1--