Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121564
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHXoPRvU-a9Q+336tJQVOSJ9jXzFYYStpegRMZHfCZYg0XBHiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHXoPRvU-a9Q+336tJQVOSJ9jXzFYYStpegRMZHfCZYg0XBHiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:03:31 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO99JmfgQE=iPw2zR9NrV-c9RrX+haEj-5-NWLPowvusCK6Zpw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad5d3506093e4bf2"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Short Function Syntax
From: marcolindev@gmail.com (Marcos Marcolin)

--000000000000ad5d3506093e4bf2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

I don't think this inclusion is a problem, but I also don't see any real
benefits.

Some parts of the syntax should be verbose to make it easier to read and
understand, especially for those who are just arriving.

Soon, people will want to be writing `pub` instead of `public`, or `priv`
instead of `private` in method or property declarations.

Just an addition to your example and my opinion. I prefer to define all
properties in the class, instead of using property promotion in the
constructor, maybe I have a serious problem.

---
*Marcos Marcolin*
Software Engineer | PHP
www.marcosmarcolin.com.br

--000000000000ad5d3506093e4bf2--