Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121556 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51229 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2023 18:46:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2023 18:46:26 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9061804B4 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:46:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com (mail-qt1-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-41cc75c55f0so19474771cf.1 for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698950782; x=1699555582; darn=lists.php.net; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kiyAB7U5iqwuxgKzB28bdd3lRIF1vFCAvphUH3JknP4=; b=MssNhV7LCjcKwFuBEsxErAIrpcEJD1gmSeoFnXK/1rZebT3XbsNAYv1ZZ6UAXZsiYY LLSKudnupWhWxqVawz6aY76SUwLBjksju6NnDNl8AqLjNyHu+RkK5CvNPDYbPkCmjJv4 HDESxQeuIIpUnPM8nX79bE3ReJI/H8pLz/z2NOdFSC9oyHw1PuzP5gMZxleFGYm2sVlV RAjBiQS6AcbLVJFrskKnC/cUQpTYElyDV1GvsL+5gwC4RUh0Vmbr1mmqDxL2WxqVZiRq S+hSvZnt6KGyeVAijn53D57VgIa672gRmPV9NiO3GG1xWZxu4AjIa8GJE5rl2HoSsAR2 xdoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698950782; x=1699555582; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kiyAB7U5iqwuxgKzB28bdd3lRIF1vFCAvphUH3JknP4=; b=JULLP7jELCQGAfum8KoJY7aLl99JDntSRE/D4I42Lhn1gazQFkRrF9ppHlcbuu2rhD fImjg49F1crsnboBviT+WsTYJiLgNV6Lo4B6Tzo7fyC2KLcbI5dLHjQ2zAiqrFDm3JJ+ rgmYttKCUw5EjboBYn/hWP1Z1E0Do8+lyv6Gddem+zOx/pqi24Xp3c/NsKpjxUWFiykC aWRYQAm9J3CiSQgYJuVGJq+OkYeDnr/xgCjMVcruW59xEvOC6R+dGCe+OUFVfV0JOVYj OfQq0XSwUf0S12fc3uK4Gerjy/QwFQQUYfqHA8nMAOSFo+ZCmUJYSsD1saazpbaJ9EdM Io5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyW6VSqV++9WRzNO+FRai++mzg/RRAvqpteGEg8b3LDk+dIvQAd F3PQJGly9Vly9kBiIv7J+nwCveqehBZ0X9W6VOFUJ3X2cBF7lA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHJ2c1kNBg4FTeepRohE/zpLaf441ImMnRBWZ1p1ZB2xkdJeaz8SbBa4+XkJ0LhHoRn4WlcAFfNsGooXGFFmQE= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5846:0:b0:3f9:aa80:b48a with SMTP id h6-20020ac85846000000b003f9aa80b48amr1197379qth.8.1698950781999; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:46:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:46:11 -0300 Message-ID: To: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Short Function Syntax From: carlosv775@gmail.com (Vinicius Dias) I honestly don't see any benefits. `function` isn't verbose, it's explicit. I prefer `function` over `fn` for methods. But despite what one may prefer, I believe changing the language syntax just because of "taste" probably isn't worth the effort.