Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121435
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABAhh3FtvJ3TMF6R8Ot1o+OzS+SMOw37U3uehgCWPrP7guHB1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <f90cb6db-d816-4a90-86d4-2760b7e721c8@processus.org> <CAMrTa2EHx3-WG_7qAPYSVRFJxs+DzFbMRd=0jtiHi1UdH+Oa_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <712f1499-77cd-4897-bc8b-e13468d5c598@processus.org>
In-Reply-To: <712f1499-77cd-4897-bc8b-e13468d5c598@processus.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:51:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMrTa2HzNahWN3PPbvCELrbPEAmnZ4hoFCPu46pjbedj7OnvQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre <pierre-php@processus.org>
Cc: someniatko <someniatko@gmail.com>, php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009218d2060815698f"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Custom object equality
From: jordan.ledoux@gmail.com (Jordan LeDoux)

--0000000000009218d2060815698f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:14=E2=80=AFAM Pierre <pierre-php@processus.org> =
wrote:

>
> Maybe I don't master english enough and I can speak to strictly
> sometime. If an operator overload RFC that doesn't have any blind spot
> or weird edge case happens, I'd be happy to see it pass, at least it
> would close bike shedding around this topic and life would continue
> happily.
>
> I can't vote, but if I could, I wouldn't vote against a proper, robust,
> and easy to debug for developers operator overload RFC, I would simply
> abstain, because even if I personally don't like it, lots of people want
> it and I'm simply one among millions of PHP users, I don't want anyone
> to be frustrated.
>
> The most important thing in my previous message I wanted to say was that
> the "~" symbol refers to something "approximate" in many contexts, in my
> opinion it's not the right choice for an equality operator. My opinion
> is either go for a full-on proper operator overload or simply don't.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> Pierre
>
>
I tried to make sure this was clear, but I will say it explicitly just to
make sure: I am not at all criticizing you, I was just saying that the
opinion you expressed is one that is shared by many voters so it cannot be
simply dismissed, and that I disagree with it personally.

Jordan

--0000000000009218d2060815698f--