Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121336 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39216 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2023 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2023 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2121804B4 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:08:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-35757bfb3f7so17868395ab.2 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:08:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697465308; x=1698070108; darn=lists.php.net; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Jn88HwCSL+RgzVKZWVNtUtiW4caVXGDjM2TO72km5uU=; b=C25PqyVW90C3ue+u23n7qHe9hNNrX0WiIb77o2ohbNEWLlK7Am0+U5fTdrXYe+dPQB Qkk+hHAndaAUms57WQAbYyQz3ckmXT64RwicEf7VIOUJue4xRUusEoV+GiE9Nw+tvRd/ vAhxeTDCaXgruUBt6xwKOyKK7d0JmGK5auGrQirhwU5F6R2o8kxmSfv7tCx3Iu70uPnJ YR0JdxTr/Y0QHpOzfKxJvjBxDjOvtk5HElK/7eSPvXCtI7kuJ2JU9ffwaOBCUNmlYkBJ 1XhupDNd13DY1RQl8Z9K9LvjMlcWFB1HhUINRbE8ExvaiT5+Yuwzhf8gqdno3CvILP4I q1jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697465308; x=1698070108; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Jn88HwCSL+RgzVKZWVNtUtiW4caVXGDjM2TO72km5uU=; b=siksYcoZIl5wRVYbSQ5BosolyVcOfNo303nwFf73Df+XpZ6Vz/QR4bGDl7JY0wPE4O WwAhxAwdGibKCq7Z7gADZXSyLN2Z4CH260TpgZ6OFWgW45o+N0IrMsVAaWqNRAbaHZPi wkzxvZ1LRWKuIV4WzszoIqW8UsegT/bFnOMoyR2SF/xPfw4XPSvXW73r2rRZSpO4yA0T 5tQKrFO+sAqlXiJDoMghE9LdjcYosHucfY2P1aDa4lsm2OykihwyNtIyrPVzXhXw9G2/ JTwXIoo/rntcxrj4E4Jt0l8aE+or44XAh8OHy1Zy6DJ07IaWN5MT0XtZ4stNucoY+69e jGfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJigR5g+rzjzy/OC0K7ZYZwSfUrPTCi3Q4NPmVv30reO+9Ihg8 FZ+f0BqnDfZUz6sAWMFGpHVFPf7WF92YegtUo26/75i2U7U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzv8XiZsZ4eKFwv4XqGJaEnYsSVtaiS1w/lfr83GFCxu1TIr4GCxHsmEbfN50TkyWgB/EUp8430t0Pjux9il8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1252:b0:34f:b9e8:a431 with SMTP id j18-20020a056e02125200b0034fb9e8a431mr35693402ilq.22.1697465307762; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6e04:20cb:b0:2ed:1ae2:83ac with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:08:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Previous discussions about generics syntax only? From: olleharstedt@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Olle_H=C3=A4rstedt?=) Hello internals, Was there a previous discussion about the pros/cons of adding only the syntax needed for generics, but not the functionality? So static analyzers could use it, instead of docblocks. I looked at externals.io but couldn't find anything specific. Regards Olle