Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:121214 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 261 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2023 09:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2023 09:44:45 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5CB18004A for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 02:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS34011 80.237.132.0/24 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from wp160.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp160.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.167]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 02:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2a02:8109:b323:1700:e5f9:7932:39d4:19d7]; authenticated by wp160.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1qnbxJ-0001Qj-GX; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 11:44:41 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:44:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;marc@mabe.berlin;1696326284;d030ac95; X-HE-SMSGID: 1qnbxJ-0001Qj-GX Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Rounding Integers as int From: marc@mabe.berlin (Marc) Hi, On 26.09.23 12:39, Marc Bennewitz wrote: > I'd like to put a new RFC under discussion: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-rounding I tried to make the RFC text a bit more clear. As I'm not a native English speaker I would be very welcome for wording suggestions and/or grammar fixes especially for the deprecation message. About the deprecation - as it's not a classical deprecation but a notice about upcoming behavior change. Would it make sense to have an additional vote, if or if not to trigger it in 8.next? Marc