Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120783
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFMT4Nq3y+XKUP7aG7F7aht1DdM7dpqxMT-hcS+Nyvc9FaT=+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMT4Np=n7ENbFvNrygc+vRRiBhtKVPFx5pN1gBMyRhMdsCVBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAfnsFUo+QU_QwiQivH9dfUH0i82tRKo-M9_Xy-n16ac9ytVmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAfnsFUo+QU_QwiQivH9dfUH0i82tRKo-M9_Xy-n16ac9ytVmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:45:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPzBOBPUwCnCo1SyY6E6au4THGFdtQxXMDu82knfASNDujV2Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Kokot <petk@php.net>
Cc: Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com>, internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023773106003b57f7"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Interface Default Methods
From: landers.robert@gmail.com (Robert Landers)

--00000000000023773106003b57f7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:04=E2=80=AFPM Peter Kokot <petk@php.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 13:37, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 6:11=E2=80=AFPM Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gma=
il.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Chatter on the [Interface Default Methods RFC][1] has been quiet for
> > > the past 6 days, and the feature freeze deadline is fast approaching
> > > for PHP 8.3, so I'm moving this to vote. It'll be open for two weeks
> > > as usual.
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who discussed weaknesses in the RFC during the
> > > discussion phase.
> > >
> > >   [1]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/interface-default-methods
> >
> > The voting period is about half-way through. For your information,
> > it's currently sitting at 10 yes and 13 no votes. Thanks to everyone
> > who has voted so far.
>
> I really liked this idea actually but I'm still not so sure about it,
> what would be the "right" approach. Just one question though. With
> this, also the protected methods would be possible to define in the
> interface? And what about the properties? Properties would be part of
> some other RFC?


It doesn't say they can't be used, so I assume we'll be able to use traits
in interfaces as well.

--00000000000023773106003b57f7--