Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120745 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28647 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2023 23:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2023 23:55:56 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5578D1804DF for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 16:55:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oa1-f43.google.com (mail-oa1-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 16:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1b38121a011so2869598fac.2 for ; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 16:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688514951; x=1691106951; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uOqVhLqAma2xyz0pCroXENtfKEEEuTxNFpHtR60dQcs=; b=PimsbqQgTpTngJzRDRCOqy8SyAx6m3Q7pDPPDw05JLinDDHX/jdKt0tMqTB+oDvgq5 OS9vtk940ELO/Dgt4YCCKyf6dekJeH7rrmzzN03ha/+E6R8t/uhPUbQUCoW/eynX0jfZ B/iIeLQp/FKIwgYwbaqWnpXWBV5/x+/YxNSjyh2I0SukzRh9qGu+nu1oLEBvwk6ezJST qLLf/Um+FaPaM+pFIW+iiZ4uFM3+ckJShRvuuE5lh0VCTDZC/0kmRwPlvlCJX/qaVfk8 /bWn15zZHwUzlqQlrN9AAND8l2ozX8o76246YjNEPvPsosrAs3wLt4zSS6vF6hM2j1Qg LMIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688514951; x=1691106951; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uOqVhLqAma2xyz0pCroXENtfKEEEuTxNFpHtR60dQcs=; b=b0x14/IALEMPazGHgE0b5Tdl6AbKIsGyCDLx8F5Ak4DOPGLs8OL+XaT6+rWUt2lnYl MrfaFIn0ArWAXGTTQygoBPW03gsL6u9hZo3Gpn9agrLM10FgsrEnMt1Z0GGNSd68l+SA zZ/BULN4sfeJGF5BzjsEeSE9GE4XAZs9Z48g8n1QakOE2Kf24058MVcQ9nO4G35+wxAH 3rqIJ37yvDtUF1fc+Wjz1F9wDSMbQIU0cBC6AFo43TFAdmdQ0BsrNbeA4rJmX/d8tQ73 9rXAlGyl6Wpu/mYefpHM+u24xq50b6mioVmAZ/RBMJVoIJbHSiinVTfKo9Nqh9hJadRe Cg9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzRja9nbhOvtmodnIctsM0ik+26oHfT5pYJ01UoIg25XJrmTPec yQPCYZ187j24efg56KxlQ9VC1Cj/XN+MQk8qC365oiR/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFB3NDwRi9wkgbrzmqspdrOEums46lFhFRsh0rPFZ9Ag0SxQtQgB96ldd7g/+c0e5ifhVlrWoKURDeLWDe3qg8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:304f:b0:1a2:7012:1ca7 with SMTP id u15-20020a056870304f00b001a270121ca7mr12634767oau.19.1688514950674; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 16:55:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 00:55:39 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5443905ffb2057f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Request karma privileges to vote on PHP RFCs From: davidgebler@gmail.com (David Gebler) --000000000000d5443905ffb2057f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:30=E2=80=AFPM Nuno Maduro = wrote: > Hi Internals, > > I am writing to request karma privileges to vote on PHP RFCs. > > I'm not a voter and have no influence here but from previous discussions which have come from similar requests, I don't think you're likely to get this. The conventional or common view is that without a regular history of contributions to internals, both via this mailing list and proposing, designing, implementing, fixing or otherwise aiding with RFCs, voting rights are not typically granted. And even whether those criteria are sufficiently met is a somewhat subjective thing. I do think the system and criteria for choosing who gets to vote is something which needs to be modernised and changed, particularly in respect of recognising significant userland authors and contributors, but the problem is probably that whenever this has come up before, no one's been able to propose a sufficiently agreeable solution. We probably all share a general principle of belief that PHP should be as open a democracy as is practical, but there must also be a consideration for the fairly small group of regular, core developers who are responsible - voluntarily - for the majority of the work maintaining the new features which work their way in. I appreciate this is therefore not a straightforward matter, even though like anyone else I'd like to be able to have a say in the future of the language I love and use every day. I think the best thing there and what I try to do myself is just make sure your voice is heard on this mailing list on the discussion period of any RFCs which interest or concern you. This mailing list is open, anyone can participate, no special karma needed. I've had one small RFC and a couple of minor bugfixes accepted too. So we know it's possible to give something back at whatever level and to whatever extent we are able and willing, and we don't need to be able to vote to do that. -Dave --000000000000d5443905ffb2057f--