Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120701 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79662 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2023 17:20:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2023 17:20:40 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA453180511 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ed1-f43.google.com (mail-ed1-f43.google.com [209.85.208.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51d9890f368so2967151a12.2 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1687886437; x=1690478437; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Icv+RF8XZVNgL6YgZugbNAKqnhojWLvyb3h+IdjT8t4=; b=KO4hPSjoDXPJCYLjzUMYtxDb4eHqQ1wmChmoMHzbIcttzLeyB3hIkOieBrX/Z7u6qi SdhuX1RIU0FMYahzXaXW1/p1KmJ+4aaqimS2CNtHcKy2ijnRXw5ggDnq7eNkXbKicRLZ 1Ddn1eHLnamBcs4dyWGWuJ1hrrEjO7kmxKhjfjMda+67qZxITx6WWP87B7kcvoXRrZR6 zZOOck7JsESFIRpEbh8yXZKBHbTyOX6KX8kIQUk42MpB6/FHNZXV9mvjPR7/t/x6Figg DpYbX48DxOwiSe0BkEOF9e1i0AbOmmE3rjp6Srlai8z8NAcyjr0hnX8LrH5FRehwc/l3 pDMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687886437; x=1690478437; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Icv+RF8XZVNgL6YgZugbNAKqnhojWLvyb3h+IdjT8t4=; b=A6FWFYCNbmzwm6bi/cDA21Dlv+74fzC3+jSKQ/NQCQsO9CXSAgJT+GmvvFL6JOhrNf ByHbXCCTSEmeRcorxPnqEsN+X3FGQcY00DAE366YAjUQRFXjJq35YkJzYnXB5EykAzFi MnZ/4aQ2FbrT+wIs17ub/eK8DT+t7+XUZ51aPAl9YRz5DkDaBCPtRGxniAC0IaGKDreo o9C/yEnNBAjGP+ixG5CEHQYvL27k6CancKmvXbq0lq8fwLgdC7c7EYdPTIqcQ0NFuwFq v/wZBm8rfuke5afW8uG5MNaNQkNlStM6YeEI9NFoG8rRT8MhUmFJ/oOnjFkNedf/6P0F 2j+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxHll6hlnNV2RkXpzabbLCmuQS0Y6TkTNTRXmEH2Wn8BNOzma5C yo//3L1bzD0OxgupsgIxuLu4oWAhsrTIhUT0x9hflGfSBKxUoyXUo+o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ54vWb05tzNr+MxuRU+XK/3A1ejCofhUliBiE/hdwEhNLILMq9UhCLcVBdylmNp4LW4ep4tFOXF9mmjPYF5fCc= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d902:0:b0:51a:4a3e:c9e with SMTP id a2-20020aa7d902000000b0051a4a3e0c9emr20654383edr.11.1687886437218; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:20:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <85c4cba3-93f0-48c7-a78a-e936df0c59c8@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <85c4cba3-93f0-48c7-a78a-e936df0c59c8@app.fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:20:26 +0200 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO Subclasses coming to vote soon. From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 17:25, Larry Garfield wrote: > > The RFC doesn't specify if `new PDO(...)` changes behavior at all. That behaviour is not changed at all. > will PDO still have the postgres methods Yes, until someone does another RFC to deprecate and remove them. > if someone does [`new PDO(...)`], will they now get back `PdoPgsql`, No. New`ing one object, and getting a different object back would be far too surprising to even be contemplated. cheers Dan Ack