Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120624 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1790 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2023 20:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2023 20:33:07 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11A018050B for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:33:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f8fa2cf847so36780455e9.1 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:33:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687206785; x=1689798785; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FQtEh4LJ5sN+ee+Ry3ACKcnh09Q4I4dm++yhM2gfqec=; b=LVb/IACB5rcLj4gDD3bD2VqM7x998bkI1I61BDyMciapvOn1iUPNZRwYz77+MfVwQh PADbrNRqfkvyCXB0Zht7yvHw3BhjZBuvg+4fzS3xNTvXVLL8SvekO94busMfA0MqmI8j DZxNcZGggvgBm4UMz/J2c53v2iAF3cMeljeQ1pb9juwYpXeL1RdivIviq1SA68Y4erly A1gQ6syawe+VQi6QEWS+fto546rlhU/cZgMqZI5/7dXCVOJ6HdnOYHuS0SVvZJWY/9Yg Mq5N9YEcit34zMN1eKFlCivRSWlXDnGi8UcNa8SPY0iuX2yHo9sRiEC8kIr1U6q5nrab MDaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687206785; x=1689798785; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FQtEh4LJ5sN+ee+Ry3ACKcnh09Q4I4dm++yhM2gfqec=; b=DWNifOhBRr16rT+ATnYwHgTKxROyF4/5Z8hF9AlRnHr6qUSqfuElQXTpH8kjx6sXP9 pc4lZUVCX2rJ78BcdaLqQwez09zjtQ46CSUy889II871xce7HEsQiYGVhPl0+xA7lQBp R4JKTj50Ls2+z7bUOTRZjozRNe+Wjeh8fSStwpNeskuZBaaRYvioUFWWPyccCtBjApCk pM2BNeu0XUwloX0jhXZxozpB2W/EIyxxnflvOqDMP44QESZNzAoSFxNJjQRo0O80cquW VjOK8wIKfmVFvPrxIiCs4oBAHMBUWx4Nb3JFv7XT721pW4RYV051VBIjqxqpzyMCOAGi ZRdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwugOM43R0d1pKkbqymNHdc/hG8bfAPr2pCaFFHsNaqLrh7vLbQ /vVr78upUCo6mWtxdpM5oXp1ltzfpBg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4vMfpCSN9Ldp0Gx7LQDFf5YNjxBVf3iZ+RB3Xy0dyMtuTZEPb4hF1cMeEr0eqh2fbx2QWm7Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e50a:0:b0:30a:e165:e68e with SMTP id j10-20020adfe50a000000b0030ae165e68emr7386283wrm.27.1687206784942; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpc83311-brig21-2-0-cust191.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.20.40.192]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i13-20020a5d438d000000b0030e5c8d55f2sm429335wrq.6.2023.06.19.13.33.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 21:33:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: internals@lists.php.net References: <108411AD-DBC4-4436-8190-7569B7A0805F@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fwd: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) On 19/06/2023 21:17, Nicolas Grekas wrote: > I think we must account for a bit of history/legacy on the topic. > I think session_set_save_handler(SessionHandlerInterface) is the best BC/FC > path we can provide. Can you elaborate? The SessionHandlerInterface is the *newer* of the two current signatures, so what does making it the preferred signature (with users of the other having to change their code) have to do with "history/legacy"? Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]