Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120594
Return-Path: <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 54112 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2023 15:48:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2023 15:48:34 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D34180511
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3090d3e9c92so7778456f8f.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=datadoghq.com; s=google; t=1686844112; x=1689436112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=P+lpPfVdX4oA4+YvOMMJo6Bp5v9/fT5/+XG8hBl5h5o=;
        b=QDMvlYpMeFpFg284ZAPgskG8H5/lcqiTny7HTc7GJMd/Bh1FIUA8U6js1jmFhKDu8V
         REPuIMlk3St/++s8pYTfnosCdTQlg+OpF4Q1ZyKwnVadSxCqMMKPpfEdUIryh93EGAHY
         JWeSBns0rjG2xbsRa2aCdoZV7A4DDukXzcElo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686844112; x=1689436112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=P+lpPfVdX4oA4+YvOMMJo6Bp5v9/fT5/+XG8hBl5h5o=;
        b=L4NlDAHv66Tv7LAXimk5sW6ojMcPjZOBkxXzy1to1iUEWQKSOoifD370Q6uC/gGkf8
         iNUW2GZVhTCSU/LVtS0JilBvqcMi/wJ8NBXyRP7ZR9fOvqQufB6rE5KfJmq4o8UphmjF
         v9r1QYG6NEfLWoS/z2UxJxFIEOwc7CS54RpT6d7/uQ+ZZ33MDjfAU4WDZy7M2X6GQNG/
         EkY2kPWtnKcqjJsBk1tSkMY4MnXcuwFAYm9tJPDjKujvUF1llcAnSKXKvdL4y+w7AWWe
         zNcJURt8N3OYZR6NBjvFcUn+pIMfMiD/Yv7ua8/DUBidJf7xr8ZWbhP/fqXoUtp8NQtA
         Gv2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwpSummzCAAmtkBc6wWzvB3ObtSYjucY1eqrkyY5uK1owj8JWyy
	6y3le4y59DopMuP6SIjQpr68KVSiSeu/hhNCTgmhFIUppKCzKX1kEt2EHhth
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6b/QLrsuqid+GLdy4tqPRDSrF8Hp/DWkoaJv4nC2M9dradK0A0qIKm6HQRWdefhHlPPtcK2Rf82uPnVRvZ3jI=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e50:0:b0:311:1390:7b55 with SMTP id
 r16-20020a5d4e50000000b0031113907b55mr2249533wrt.68.1686844112122; Thu, 15
 Jun 2023 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAKU0umNOJ+6x44WRuzc2e9_5sDehAq5UB_aFn+cT4wxTny9wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <648AAE1D.9070805@adviesenzo.nl> <CAAKU0uk=tKzzaGRJAF+7WaT-3CbCwjJbHFbc4WCqCRK_9+OOgw@mail.gmail.com>
 <648B30B5.50705@adviesenzo.nl>
In-Reply-To: <648B30B5.50705@adviesenzo.nl>
Reply-To: Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:48:20 -0600
Message-ID: <CAAKU0unrConpMq18LR3ujWo2roDLqxbc6mZPcbHwPEjdW+gXEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliette Reinders Folmer <php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Interface Default Methods
From: internals@lists.php.net ("Levi Morrison via internals")

> I still believe this information should be added to the RFC as the risk
> of adding new methods to an interface which collide with existing
> methods in implementations of that interface is very real, though I
> agree with Deleu that this BC impact is not so much of the RFC, but of
> what can happen once the RFC would be accepted.

Juliette, it's in the RFC under the second bullet point here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/interface-default-methods#backward_incompatible_changes.
Is there something specific you'd like added there?