Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:120195
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 9147 invoked from network); 5 May 2023 16:00:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 May 2023 16:00:36 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616DB18050B
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  5 May 2023 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,
	SPF_NEUTRAL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS30827 82.113.144.0/20
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <derick@php.net>
Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  5 May 2023 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36D2910C401;
	Fri,  5 May 2023 17:00:34 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 17:00:34 +0100 (BST)
To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <6b5de716-d769-4f0b-b3e6-5a5a211f035a@app.fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <02d88c78-65ba-05cf-926b-58ae844dfd29@php.net>
References: <6b5de716-d769-4f0b-b3e6-5a5a211f035a@app.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Discussion] Callable types via Interfaces
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023, Larry Garfield wrote:

> Before we dig into any of those edge cases, however, we want to throw 
> the question out: Is this general approach even acceptable?

I think I would vote against all three options. It is hard to put a 
pulse on, but IMO it looks too complex. I'd say: wait for type aliases.

cheers,
Derick