Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:12007 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60171 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Aug 2004 16:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60147 invoked by uid 1007); 8 Aug 2004 16:47:57 -0000 Message-ID: <20040808164757.60111.qmail@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net References: <20040806142704.76822.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <4116334C.5060700@php.net> <20040808145613.36888.qmail@pb1.pair.com> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:47:52 -0700 Lines: 21 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Posted-By: 64.142.6.231 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] IPv6 DNS records with dns_*() functions From: pollita@php.net ("Sara Golemon") > > It is actually the other way around. AAAA is the official standard and > > A6 is deprecated for years. > > > hmm, from http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/ i get the same idea, yet on other > websites it is mentioned sometimes that A6 is the "new" AAAA.. .pretty > weird.. > > if both are used in practice tho, i think PHP should parse them both, don't > you think? > I saw one reference to preferred order of resolution being A => A6 => AAAA which implies that A6 has a higher order of preference than AAAA. Also, the DNS record type number for A6 is higher than AAAA, again indicating that AAAA preceeded A6 in adoption. In either event, as Ron states, there's no harm in covering 'em all. -Sara