Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119903 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52828 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2023 09:40:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2023 09:40:49 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8611804D7 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:40:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id n9-20020a05600c4f8900b003f05f617f3cso10629181wmq.2 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:40:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681206043; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u4JvAFQk5l6zoiWkNLCml/psJqr1QsnBTFemZXnTgx0=; b=tFMJmtARuzza7XixAGqatHZr9iILY+Z25Dg3kqLZTyReQiTaL4r0s6U+Zp5RtgwiWi sR4hZgZinoQWIZJQCyo8l69zZ4DFFqIhAkrxAspLmPWEWTXKCJC84I9Ativu2CwN7/9/ W35c6EyhQm5CwwTtgQyd0ynz67AXp12P0kAc8Kbk1KHTLBR9HSgc4br/1MsO21HzeQmJ 4CRsdiJSab+SBr0Iae8jjA9V5JM0g1ZncV46/YVPfmGOB3iSCuFFjrju6/JDoiiCF6MO eisMEtrHZd05Hwba3ciTTYFMqfE6jOAiBraczjBCl5kvaZbfdwxEBQvEl5thBIHxR5Cr 93/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fvkkf0gCYtpaZf1TF3rIefoSr/4tc1lG84x5Nd4laYTxyQUWK7 Usf9kuxEq0Cc3yaTMOX03ziqnNGOXiFpjxjFiIl6Ug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aXG4XRF32hRgYrcdsJGSPKbiKx1U1vVmR6/WdB86XhR/fpnUNbHQNUGnBlCZ4QWe0FVesU7g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c405:0:b0:3ed:4627:ed09 with SMTP id k5-20020a7bc405000000b003ed4627ed09mr6433922wmi.28.1681206043590; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (ec2-35-177-161-204.eu-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [35.177.161.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u14-20020a05600c00ce00b003ed243222adsm16367140wmm.42.2023.04.11.02.40.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 02:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\)) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:40:31 +0100 References: <8abbed60-5569-4eca-ad12-957877feed9b@app.fastmail.com> To: php internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0A4FDAA0-F63E-461B-8286-C526B85A30EB@sewell.info> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Future stability of PHP? From: php@sewell.info (Matthew Sewell) Just to follow up on that, and going totally off topic, I was reading = about thanks.dev the other day. One of our concerns is that we can easily give money to top level = projects or things we consciously add but how do you give it to all the = dependencies and the thanks.dev approach seems a good idea (I have a = separate problem in that our projects are rarely on GitHub or GitLab) = but does anybody who would actually benefit from it have any thoughts on = whether it would be good for them or not? > On 11 Apr 2023, at 10:09, Matthew Sewell wrote: >=20 > What's meaningful in this sense? >=20 > I have a budget for supporting open source projects (back to my money = v time point) and a percentage of that is for the PHP Foundation. I'd = happily pay LTS fees we pay elsewhere (even sometimes as a safety net) = to the Foundation but believe that the money we give to projects is just = that, a donation that the project can use as it sees fit, rather than = the purchasing of a service as we do commercially. >=20 > Best wishes, >=20 > Matt >=20 >> On 11 Apr 2023, at 09:56, Marco Pivetta wrote: >>=20 >> I'm also curious to hear whether any participants in this thread = do/did >> support the PHP foundation in any tangible way :D >>=20 >> If you treat it like an LTS provider, perhaps it's time to pay up the = LTS >> support fees? >>=20 >> Marco Pivetta >>=20 >> https://mastodon.social/@ocramius >>=20 >> https://ocramius.github.io/ >>=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 10:40, Alex Wells wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:10=E2=80=AFAM Deleu = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I don't want to use those weird stuff, but I'm >>>> doing the best I can to replace every single line of old code that = has >>> been >>>> written in an era that "best practices for PHP development" were = not what >>>> you and I know today. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I still do not understand why you're expecting the whole PHP project = to put >>> in enormous efforts to keep the backwards compatibility and solve = your >>> problems (temporarily) instead of you doing so. What's stopping you = from >>> using the last supported PHP version by that codebase and fixing or, = worst >>> case scenario, rewriting it if you wish, while on that (non latest) = PHP >>> version? What causes the desperation to update to the latest PHP? Is = it new >>> features or security fixes, or both? >>>=20 >=20