Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119803 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92324 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2023 19:40:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2023 19:40:42 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5C71804B3 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id t4so14972620wra.7 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:40:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680205239; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vc5POIst4nurQ5bFwdM/rpMvntKaANMS7HjtVQlHuXw=; b=f7/GLwsWZQMZoCY/fkA+/1NAA2cUiyh1UH9wDJZDdon43lBqeSrnjAeZDFeIq3EjFW mxx+1J2Ne8U4sJzKTYP00frfR3LfggI9XjHJnC4bZMuBR5xq4uZlLDk6/sDrf21+tO69 +i3jgeKId3bXPs+OAtbt+yHxRhYRVdzyUA9b5mogx7NhZomorI81iNFWjLRRJFFNIIcy T11HV/ZmtTjuBRF+BtCVyIWa7E8JVDOr+gnC3ytAzyYVaYjvRm+rcLO+KUthe2zYNN/q 3Skr3VfN3Fa4KccWh1vplOxiY/joMsgzTvelV36R6G8jyiUVZn0YbYtRqgPHW/TTI2pX 7LsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680205239; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vc5POIst4nurQ5bFwdM/rpMvntKaANMS7HjtVQlHuXw=; b=rk1vKRnBbKOW6Lenedr+hsfRynnTQO979c4RnT3v0FD9IAOCRxh7hk2uYO/MbT1zgp sKnUnNCyJez+cjLN161Fqpq+3ywUbYOo0vPsVavDPdfYzBVUndO0NwVhLox9QahUOnd1 vzeMVMuXjSukL3M6V3D/QjTHWUveNmKU/Wh49ZpNzYAKYCAlIJRu6FWBYQA8kCOGOiLk XRj/p/TZ+R5VKOOka8y1vF724nn6ugUis8HDM/h7PbpDgV8g8xB649TiJ85aHUN17b0I GSOSw544DWsjzIiBBuBdKdoxujNnoond+nVLrD/St8eQg1d7aDna+b2je6fX42QFp/23 Y0/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fpB8lLwb3qFTEErBRpcXsFL6qXDb3aX+Uy/VrikFpDN20gunsX GETO46w0tNCVTH/CriQWhtwmuOjSz6zLk1IK1MMZ2ELFoUQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350a9H5fV+GBQUPgUg70gpA5g1nuDOubpx0Dr4AheGXz0wPc46bZr8T57EhK2rbcSedFtRiiDUi8I3V40xgZjoBQ= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e44a:0:b0:2d1:481d:5855 with SMTP id t10-20020adfe44a000000b002d1481d5855mr4291511wrm.10.1680205239473; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:40:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <080d1241-0956-41bf-aaf3-d9582cfce3ef@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:40:28 +0200 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072da4305f82344ad" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Properties in interfaces From: fekzol.13ker@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Zolt=C3=A1n_Fekete?=) --00000000000072da4305f82344ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 2:21 PM, Alexandru P=C4=83tr=C4=83nescu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:50=E2=80=AFPM Larry Garfield > wrote: > >> >> This is a part of the "Property Hooks" RFC that Ilija and are working on= . >> It's not *quite* done yet, but it's mostly there. The draft is availabl= e >> here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property-hooks >> >> > Do you think we could have a smaller RFC that only deals with properties in > interfaces that are just like what's allowed in classes right now, public > and public readonly? > The need seems to be: a readonly property in classes and a interface that > signals a get-only access so maybe readonly flag on interface attribute i= s > clear. Hey, So I just recently joined the mailing list, and in another discussion I read something about how to answer properly. I hope I didn't mess it up. So read the RFC, and that is waaay more extensive. And as I'm just starting to participate I cannot really add more to than: as far as my experience goes, I think a smaller RFC would not really be compatible with that. And I think that just renders mine "closed", being already in progress. Anyways: I was about to ask - but then I forgot - is there any up-to-date documentation / tutorial besides https://www.phpinternalsbook.com/. I found some from some blog, but then I saw that they are at least 10 years old. Mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen / Best regards Zolt=C3=A1n Fekete --00000000000072da4305f82344ad--