Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119800 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82801 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2023 17:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2023 17:50:07 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF5B180511 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id o24-20020a05600c511800b003ef59905f26so12320172wms.2 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680198604; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=iLhEthPZW2wQDoHRBhk2TtfkW4V0R7DLoFTydcR2wlM=; b=aTdiHTndhQMP3jpqLYMc9IPopkJvfWpDAQ4yjZhp88we+kPc50nePJny648WrisZYI S3FNgjzPBaEDx/mq6Xq6l+C9/WuY+parB0giO4/DF+3wuikyqw8SyZ93e1tUWjEaNrsw 4HI2HbS3rk8lr6EfykN8jPzG7uBOtogN7gbH1aSDDt3irrCYOrciVYy5W63z+jbF3JJy cbjrAI0WCvg/O4ouiavkzCLYr6gp/BazHqq5/YI8ix01Bt2DbdaoZBTl2suuneP4PeSY Q/GqNYCV6QJ7GbvnARxTk4yvsKP+C4hf5TtoQz7ELfK3dYEZgGo95eV46FogJ6oyloUu YUfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680198604; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iLhEthPZW2wQDoHRBhk2TtfkW4V0R7DLoFTydcR2wlM=; b=vJHs1Mb1cr/LVPKI+binxXivO/14sbZ19w4i8amU5dfAMmavzQyfxDakoViv6C3xZd 247H8omCYPTpNlnVOvwN45MFeY4iEFgCCyHwjvGFmlt9aK25t/S3Lds69/1e9O3dGrlO BeLk21PxYk8K/1g9LefOtvc3lHm/wn57JiSEELk8JZIH8VQLWY8PitYFhr2AnHCyXa9R AVoJak512C2fQdfVHkUNFm/4uD+c4SHv6i7haHdQiQA3jXf6zvLiHCc0eRyALrDe0xCk 9nfm0Apv37Hn7BStmKteGZzbXmaGrvN3iPHFNL9yBqeytgFw0CMUGedpVOykL2EU37Am RFyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVtfKAaXqDTl+AEqrWa5YiAGBh7AHUeE/LOWgYWgFhZbADWpUwF 5XHJvxWGoU+t2Xb/i57gNCKuZMwn4ik= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9g41ZehwaXpul8kQ/uG27W9xynTB2BxfrbOJjaWXgPGfu96Ed+Z5mTi7oHSe+yS4GpBog2nw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7406:0:b0:3ed:320a:3721 with SMTP id p6-20020a1c7406000000b003ed320a3721mr19460507wmc.22.1680198604354; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpc83311-brig21-2-0-cust191.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.20.40.192]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p11-20020a1c740b000000b003eb596cbc54sm6277wmc.0.2023.03.30.10.50.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------YiKOy0lXQj0mWGqU3iSb8fVv" Message-ID: <74cf094b-b55a-f4ff-5f01-3fa441d18085@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:50:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: internals@lists.php.net References: <0D24BC4B-0A78-40A9-BF6B-627D4C7AD303@cschneid.com> <9b44fa16-5bac-4dbe-872f-d64a0b652e52@app.fastmail.com> <7A1ADE50-23BC-4CCA-B469-AC88E4FAA47B@derickrethans.nl> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Broken Wiki Registraiton (was: [IDEA] allow extending enum) From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) --------------YiKOy0lXQj0mWGqU3iSb8fVv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 30/03/2023 17:49, Larry Garfield wrote: >> Please no. As it's a destructive operation that you can't easily work >> around in email clients. Trimming recipients is doable. > Then we need a cultural shift to get people to trim more, because I got two copies of your email, which show together in a thread even when I filter email separately. Also, some guidance on who to trim and when. I count 7 people who *could* be in the reply list for this message if it hadn't been trimmed (Rokas, George, Larry, Tim, Lynn, Christian, Derick); I have no idea who is interested in getting a duplicate notification of this reply, so tend to assume that the polite thing is to trim all of them. On 30/03/2023 17:59, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > The mail client can't detect whether I'm the intended "direct" > recipient of a single email within a large thread. Especially not if I > didn't previously participate in it, but someone wants my opinion or > expertise. That's actually a good argument for *not* using Reply All by default, because as the person *sending* the message, deciding when to *add* you as a direct recipient is considerably easier than deciding when to *remove* you. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] --------------YiKOy0lXQj0mWGqU3iSb8fVv--