Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119798
Feedback-ID: i8414410d:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-238-g746678b8b6-fm-20230329.001-g746678b8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b7f0ec9f-a0a7-4a9b-943f-db6009a95396@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A1ADE50-23BC-4CCA-B469-AC88E4FAA47B@derickrethans.nl>
References: 
 <CAF-mU4yTkfERD8zDW7HHxXBEevOnaa_OEPuEAJvJ9L38XA9d6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPFaMJ8kQYuH-zAvEeCwK-QLppqsdF5sSsOGUMPr99kh8yewg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF-mU4z2+seOrgY7vza3i0NGif5nM9SSJKqp-K3_CSyzvicLYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALKiJKqR4sxKWMX=3a5VFwnZKzBOY6k5w8kXPB0BKojdzJLqZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF-mU4wUiN3sOLkif1tTAorv08=5rrQT3SEQ2qxVfCNXnKMaHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <d96e9330-ed68-42ca-b713-0e256027a5cd@app.fastmail.com>
 <CAF-mU4zt=z2a2XP8x6X+fcyx2KbijN3_w6M2KUJu2_DfjHdmBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <acafbdbb-9cb1-abab-dd9d-84fbae18541e@bastelstu.be>
 <CANS-=pd2=D=_WEtfgqJ5fydq3pBonFNs6Qh0pM6bFXtbLMUGvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0D24BC4B-0A78-40A9-BF6B-627D4C7AD303@cschneid.com>
 <9b44fa16-5bac-4dbe-872f-d64a0b652e52@app.fastmail.com>
 <7A1ADE50-23BC-4CCA-B469-AC88E4FAA47B@derickrethans.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:49:44 +0000
To: "php internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Broken Wiki Registraiton (was: [IDEA] allow extending enum)
From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield")

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On 30 March 2023 14:56:55 BST, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 9:25 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>> Am 30.03.2023 um 10:50 schrieb Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>>> , and most importantly you have to remind yourself.every time to press "reply all".
>>>
>>> As it is sufficient to just reply to the mailing list this could 
>>> technically be changed by adding a Reply-To. The downside would be that 
>>> it makes private replies harder and the occasional slip-up could send a 
>>> private reply to the list instead.
>>> IMHO private replies should be kept to a minimum so I think 
>>> (re-)considering adding a Reply-To might be worth it.
>>
>> Most mail clients I've used in the past decade have a "reply to list"
>> function that I use extensively, which works quite well.  
>> That said, I am really sick of getting
>> double copies of every reply in a thread after I've posted
>> in it, so I would be delighted to update Reply-To to go back
>> to the list only if it means I get
>> less duplicate email. :-) 
>
> Please no. As it's a destructive operation that you can't easily work 
> around in email clients. Trimming recipients is doable. 

Then we need a cultural shift to get people to trim more, because I got two copies of your email, which show together in a thread even when I filter email separately.

--Larry Garfield