Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119796 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73232 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2023 16:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2023 16:27:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6C11804AC for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:27:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS30827 82.113.144.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [148.252.133.53]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9444710C5B6; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:27:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:27:50 +0100 To: Larry Garfield , php internals User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <9b44fa16-5bac-4dbe-872f-d64a0b652e52@app.fastmail.com> References: <0D24BC4B-0A78-40A9-BF6B-627D4C7AD303@cschneid.com> <9b44fa16-5bac-4dbe-872f-d64a0b652e52@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: <7A1ADE50-23BC-4CCA-B469-AC88E4FAA47B@derickrethans.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPHP-DEV=5D_Broken_Wiki_Registrait?= =?US-ASCII?Q?on_=28was=3A_=5BIDEA=5D_allow_extending_enum=29?= From: derick@derickrethans.nl (Derick Rethans) On 30 March 2023 14:56:55 BST, Larry Garfield wr= ote: >On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 9:25 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: >> Am 30=2E03=2E2023 um 10:50 schrieb Lynn : > > >>> , and most importantly you have to remind yourself=2Eevery time to pre= ss "reply all"=2E >> >> As it is sufficient to just reply to the mailing list this could=20 >> technically be changed by adding a Reply-To=2E The downside would be th= at=20 >> it makes private replies harder and the occasional slip-up could send a= =20 >> private reply to the list instead=2E >> IMHO private replies should be kept to a minimum so I think=20 >> (re-)considering adding a Reply-To might be worth it=2E > > Most mail clients I've used in the past decade have a "reply to list" > function that I use extensively, which works quite well=2E =20 > That said, I am really sick of getting > double copies of every reply in a thread after I've posted > in it, so I would be delighted to update Reply-To to go back > to the list only if it means I get > less duplicate email=2E :-)=20 Please no=2E As it's a destructive operation that you can't easily work ar= ound in email clients=2E Trimming recipients is doable=2E=20 You can handle duplicates locally too if you must=2E=20 cheers=20 Derick=20