Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119723
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPyj-LDuXQftpyei9pCE0vKoee0fr2GUyTvtbY6NVaSFPs9nWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAwdEzB0yEzDr-K56R+RQHK7toXkZvf=rwUJ_xZhcRFi+5AC3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAwdEzB0yEzDr-K56R+RQHK7toXkZvf=rwUJ_xZhcRFi+5AC3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:53:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPyj-LBxtryGy+SMS=b2R9kKrdaLwCqmF21UX6SdcwX5UyqdHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote announcement] Arbitrary static variable initializers
From: tovilo.ilija@gmail.com (Ilija Tovilo)

Hi Alexandru

>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers
>> https://externals.io/message/118976
>>
>> There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote
>> early next week.
>>
> Only a small thing in the example for "ReflectionFunction::getStaticVariables()" section.
> I expect the third var_dump to print 1 also since the static statement is not going to be executed again when calling foo(2).
> Am I wrong?

Nope, you're absolutely right. That was a mistake on my part. I
adjusted the example, thanks for pointing it out!

Ilija

@Alexandru Sorry for the duplicate mail, I forgot to press Reply All.