Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119713 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20729 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2023 17:43:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2023 17:43:47 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618161804F2 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:43:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id q14so1200062pff.10 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:43:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678902226; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AvyB0bL195Bk0tQzJ+5QAA8cA9z5iGJ0QKvEffcK4bE=; b=Zylb+nil5dFpGY7o/dOVcjdwoCDzGf5D03LbrccJpRVhNMaeM70BZE/EbAPqKNUZLs q7bwXAHjcw6xd59qwyfi8+7/PTru7rr/3e3BDHVC+AJI2a5WpU1UC8SV8UsAVujEB9s4 vTIr6s9UKH+15pxLzqVf23GIwj88v6JqVgqtZzzLfzwPCsPrKCnD4hASb/blcpwmZsDH Z1kDs0Hply9Ho0kQgs1j/LXjuJkgYDXL8P+3ntPd0Q2Z02L6oVWAKab1HnO4yfWmf0TL HI0F0H2XPjh6eOEDoDpfO7o6u852JRB66zv5PjcUyCAUB9pKAoUZg6D84w3YDzQ3X/qW UUgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678902226; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AvyB0bL195Bk0tQzJ+5QAA8cA9z5iGJ0QKvEffcK4bE=; b=AUglDBiTC+K+Gns4IUlVn+uVfDX0wUI6qwCFEFw+IJ8s6Ogth2ITWmTf7NjdUSK8Lv 5C1qMk6GsWXb2mSTYV5C6JzoF95RVaAgx9FrKB64k3QVGn2gEnPfqNSA3VzYV5zJntDn knV/KrN6uFBZa8VrX35/WUgHoHKi+dSUOEfphNlq6eXWdK7MPZxzduAiDJXre+86LlEG lOjBiVFSwCsxpk06lmwFDk4cyfzYcwRD0ZuSqf6y5tZZvUlOrxwByYuMbGoZl8nliIdz 0o8UsmgU66VfLrL3zqtCZfrmBDMXSoXUTRC+q6eY0gJrbUvYogBJE2lVPFYlySfy0NVl ASdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWarYOlYqmP/DMepH0K0N+75hgMz86zSqKMAWpJ3eQezpzEmh6Y SiFQCIBLZVHFFBpvCihVcQQB4/ZKhgwT+pVbmgmIVyoi X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9lzNKUqhpVNvuf8jaz70kP2VDk3LXSGjPZBUbPkvCi2nMWA+VgC4adVLVfnaDwim9Gh4fnCDJXWVcStnVJMuU= X-Received: by 2002:a65:4144:0:b0:503:2679:ebf3 with SMTP id x4-20020a654144000000b005032679ebf3mr26140pgp.10.1678902225656; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:43:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ilija Tovilo Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c5e08d05f6f3e2fb" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote announcement] Arbitrary static variable initializers From: drealecs@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Alexandru_P=C4=83tr=C4=83nescu?=) --000000000000c5e08d05f6f3e2fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 14:02 Ilija Tovilo wrote: > Hi everybody > > It's been a while since I've announced this RFC. > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers > https://externals.io/message/118976 > > There haven't been many responses, so I'd like to put this to a vote > early next week. > > Only a small thing in the example for "ReflectionFunction::getStaticVariables()" section. I expect the third var_dump to print 1 also since the static statement is not going to be executed again when calling foo(2). Am I wrong? Regards, Alex --000000000000c5e08d05f6f3e2fb--