Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119695 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23010 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2023 18:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2023 18:28:37 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2FB1804DF for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f43.google.com (mail-ua1-f43.google.com [209.85.222.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f43.google.com with SMTP id ay14so4670965uab.13 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678818511; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=23SPi7S7GF67zY97Dh4uTkgOWD8ihI32uQLqsGWd06Y=; b=OXdyQa7hPbFRPf0f+fdxJHellqRKhxZ1miBpXj71d+4od83fQdsDMvnoagZPdKAXoa M8nUTTBpbEEAyRS981N33H04imucr5XLhonMJ+umQoGU64BLAnvVw7F6fi3QQfAkQaQB lYvw4T0popA5Eh7tlGDhO+oTuFwoltw89w8Nhs+xf8nZsXzXXViBSPSdIHHUeMR8Dss6 +GmGUq3KHSI9HCjkSD2JwdvUMB58FFg3kduHfXZ3KtPvzABZVZG+2BJ5x0tOGVtfse9j 7rfA+kpRkTNUqV6cYmrjWBXU4cuclTP0pELmHdGtMNS8HqX35/Fp5oN+eKeol/9zTpU2 uU0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678818511; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=23SPi7S7GF67zY97Dh4uTkgOWD8ihI32uQLqsGWd06Y=; b=6po3OdBZIYUm9Cf/9CE9awPHulevFxEttkAtmMztQFYwvgvveOsKBXolOLpc90WDpd TBF/l/QuJut4Z/dIfKWPlWNP/upXA3OuN7S3sR/0If2sQw6T6tm17PCtDLq3iQPPodG+ atALQpaZN/rTcOXPv0ZWvgBqkbkRaswZiqvrD1U5FzfRdTao5cG0I8tqv0aE9auftmp+ EV73kxIP+dMDEPJTLGRQW+KxXq0Ih+6Sc9xHoUoNzas4QRcRSOWBPSq9xLhgugHLe2Qf q4rZhhXUkaGWdnWUm3G+35ehCNpxpOyAf0Wndb/2c3Y1FF2QYH7/RFglw2m++cuJCnHp B84w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWxs71wXaRQI9j/GWvbDvIcUv8NpDtGUJypOgEqQgzrkmD8cZtX hCAC0XQivwDdtJRWSaZz2+XEva5T8o/6c9fhpJWWHtWBvnM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+wXhmJzRtQbONoVixYsxV6PVBJ7mQ8CYE5gQRSwhKI4hZf7Uzy3yWIfbzGehPGFGDVfhTSBdCQ9uEXFueZ4gA= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a9c7:0:b0:401:73f4:dfe with SMTP id s190-20020a1fa9c7000000b0040173f40dfemr24114329vke.3.1678818511355; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:28:20 +0100 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003054405f6e0654b" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: code optimizations From: jorg.sowa@gmail.com (Joerg Sowa) --00000000000003054405f6e0654b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Seems Uncle Bob with his boy scout rule left the room... This comment is very, very unnecessary. The message sent to the new potential maintainers by the outcome of the whole discussion is not very promising and such cheap irony doesn't help neither. I hope that at least PHP internals community can learn how to handle such cooperation problems in the future to bring a new value, not to effectively discourage people from contributing. On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:39=E2=80=AFPM Eugene Sidelnyk wrote: > Seems Uncle Bob with his boy scout rule left the room... > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 2:19 PM Max Kellermann wrote: > > > On 2023/03/01 13:15, Max Kellermann wrote: > > > IMO this is a bug in the process, and I'm trying to fix it. It shoul= d > > > be allowed to merge small incremental improvements without a dedicate= d > > > RFC. > > > > > > This is the first draft of my RFC: > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/code_optimizations > > > > My RFC draft is hereby withdrawn. I no longer intend to upstream my > > PHP improvements. Sorry for the noise. > > > > Max > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > --00000000000003054405f6e0654b--