Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119582 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60417 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2023 14:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2023 14:46:13 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4091C180539 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 06:46:13 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com (mail-pj1-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 06:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id ei9-20020a17090ae54900b002349a303ca5so1628655pjb.4 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 06:46:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n+WnpDgodxez1fBypOnHCuCaw4ciVvTJhQT6tr9SjBg=; b=qOjvdBNNf8QEsWqwPNTAuY6KFF5lyiAb3sMWogelhwaD6wy2OnoICpD/R+eIVYuULk iqwveI3WbeVB8k3ARiFUBYAjENWJJZ/pRabyVBOdDvGUF3HNJCxed11YKMeuNNKRF4UO t6Emhpys/0Tc3NZLsjYlQpTq2Fpsj+jJ2Nqq/lF+h7lGtxnjPDVna+CBJPN5LJ7J25GG +6sVFtn+ES0uoI4upa3YVwpK8rZs5lutCc/jFHRYVz8KqekIyCiPUqnvMe51tVXa/8Y0 FeB1uTWm8twYAasnxdozzDJfpEr7Za57s1OyMDYlUVP0v31dE44ZGCZQ1Nf7sd4MS7r/ pfLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=n+WnpDgodxez1fBypOnHCuCaw4ciVvTJhQT6tr9SjBg=; b=uS7ANI2ZH2vMiams7lNO8iA9U94BRFweXiPfdLpu9bj6rvpQwS6xzKIBuV1SOzlRcv 4qFIwXhhNgte99EAbLIteuD2FBZqDv6VbsENiRruTD9+L9Sgael5XAfNnsj+LKN3UccN Gl5R8QdoUCrUic8hW3w5iFda61+w0EA4zzDpep2Xiwt3roo8ZtAXbY5LmjgXqXboa/Be bnL49F0n7Wt3s8n9amj3Ak0mzpb27PhHGXgqyWNxLIGsDn2QtrlkgnMLteXPGetJ+qJ0 DPGRO52xPUC8omgiM1YKbV/ahZiD+T8oUu8/dB9ypbpDzB50pXpYf7Wi25b8+hroRPmi 6+ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU6CmMWmsyzxTLDg2Hnamcqjp6zfLxgAULTXHg0CrbMOsJI5eqX 5QpHLx2chZcSca2aClm5k3mk1GbufIePPsOO2QeseOX7V7o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set99i3QsulwTNZC0jSFWbGk9le9mvq1IhXlMDeliwu8bpNohkCWIh6bu6HDzD2HqcWTIQC7tKBHJjX08LHcnQUU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1651:b0:233:a8ae:d198 with SMTP id il17-20020a17090b165100b00233a8aed198mr3638295pjb.99.1676904371817; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 06:46:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:46:00 +0000 Message-ID: To: Andreas Hennings Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067902e05f522b99c" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Saner array_(sum|product)() From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.") --00000000000067902e05f522b99c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 14:38, Andreas Hennings wrote: > Hello, > the RFC seems like a good idea to me. > However, I do not see any mention of plus operator on arrays, e.g. ['a' => > 'A'] + ['b' => 'B']. The array_reduce() would support this, but I think > array_sum() would not, because of the return type. I just think this should > be made more explicit. > -- Andreas > Arrays are mentioned in the RFC, and they are already not supported in the array_(sum|product) functions and remain unsupported. Best, George P. Banyard --00000000000067902e05f522b99c--