Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119562 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18203 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2023 07:59:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2023 07:59:23 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856F71804BD for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 23:59:22 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NEUTRAL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS30827 82.113.144.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 23:59:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [148.252.128.220]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B302C10C530; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:59:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:59:20 +0000 To: internals@lists.php.net, Max Kellermann User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <97F04371-A963-4A82-80E0-A94A4DC5B794@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] include cleanup RFC declined From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On 15 February 2023 15:18:31 GMT, Max Kellermann wrote= : >On 2023/02/01 13:13, Max Kellermann wrote: >> Voting starts now, please vote on my RFC: >> https://wiki=2Ephp=2Enet/rfc/include_cleanup > >Hi, > >voting of https://wiki=2Ephp=2Enet/rfc/include_cleanup has ended today at >15 UTC=2E > >The majority of voters (52%) voted "Yes" on the primary vote - "Should >#include directives be cleaned up?" - but the required supermajority >for a primary vote was not met=2E Therefore, the primary vote is >declined=2E (snip)=20 >Interestingly, of all things, the most intrusive vote ("Is it allowed >to split a large header to reduce dependencies?") got accepted by a >supermajority=2E I'll assemble a PR with just the header splitting >commits and submit it for merging=2E Secondary votes are irrelevant if the primary one doesn't pass=2E=20 cheers Derick=20