Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119395
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPFaMLtOAkRzTsqfdhvkZZ17JpUBg_WSQBpgVU6+xg-mLt2zA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMrTa2FKRrv8=Cr5tgs3_QSwo329Ta_k74sVW2smJXL6vNO-jQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrTa2FKRrv8=Cr5tgs3_QSwo329Ta_k74sVW2smJXL6vNO-jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:07:13 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFPFaMKwW6KwrhcZkOeYWU2OG93quY88GYi1pJwZzAuyph7EsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ca3e405f2ee1492"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Path to Saner Increment/Decrement operators
From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.")

--0000000000008ca3e405f2ee1492
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 19:44, Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't see a section in the RFC about JIT or anything related to OpCache,
> but I know from experience with the Operator Overloads RFC that there are
> several architecture specific assembly optimizations for ++ and --. Have
> these been considered, and how will they be impacted?
>

The only assembly specific code is for integer increments/decrements, as
those are not affected by this RFC there is no impact to them.

Best regards,

George P. Banyard

--0000000000008ca3e405f2ee1492--