Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119264
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAESVnVo3NyM_RGybyLQSko0F=fBSnSWG3gkVZtU-DS8W=79fdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2c700f58-cdb6-49b1-b40a-b92cc69bf0fe@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2c700f58-cdb6-49b1-b40a-b92cc69bf0fe@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:12:45 -0600
Message-ID: <CAESVnVpYj92YVFzW2QyK78B4xkkskk90Pza=RTG-qex4aZ=D6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025f15b05f200f33b"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] base64url format
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)

--00000000000025f15b05f200f33b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:44 AM Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
wrote:
>
> > Can hold a vote if anyone objects, but this seems fairly
non-controversial.
> >
>
> It sounds to me like there's enough discussion to be had on the How to
warrant a formal RFC.  I get the sense once the bikeshedding is done it
will pass, but it's going to need the discussion/review.
>

Yep, that's my reading at this point to. Expect an RFC to be inbound with
the initial feedback integrated (e.g. new funcs vs flags).

-Sara

--00000000000025f15b05f200f33b--