Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119052 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63317 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2022 20:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2022 20:46:10 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7461804F7 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:46:07 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g7so23897488lfv.5 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:46:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EfInEeqIBeXJyIanxdXrAcNfNwYZGGWFFduGmJFLACQ=; b=GSNlrCvwrFurEtf4GWGkCRL8jflEuBDFBNG2WsTHD/OSmWQAHGj3if8topjMm+cr8n 6mAMpNoROENbIux8goqXlUo3sqSgFUJd3GCqHOCs2llryOu+nkARZWkKcKq1pSuZgrAB OWcJR7lVup/A4NM/8F8hxR15OO48xMonyJ7gP1BBXWNNwPwC6tA39FAwZfysfya5ZdNR YsTFpi7Brk+n54hQF5qh+tUPlEC4h4Z07gTWFoBj7mtLVxg9fPHWLvWdt9NIIfjD97Pi 6fKtchD2zmNSNzVhNDeETtnw3R8j0eljmqol1kBCUvDJ9fFXhn4aK+fIbPvzWCK7/650 ALzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=EfInEeqIBeXJyIanxdXrAcNfNwYZGGWFFduGmJFLACQ=; b=4viob6C8abykXy6olBKxsLjQSPuQ2roPb9Wz55xyRKfHDqEpcYPZzFFbNnb6+x04na bdVR1QBTsO9BYtU2sNWZHPQVH9GWf8Oo4W4x6EmW2qAjT7+FcoPysTy6ILOTBa1szNht wkAzsQKPQM14XAzP9JIQe1wgb4Q+Q6pWi2P7Ogq2RheU4GXxa0uFMkP/CeMuLyuUjlDG M10ziKbmLUL1WdR3gM4ab6H0ac/tePY3cQEY8GJITNjL4xXMwTB6e4H3TusBldGNvB3x dVlrfjEAERRq5QE14+XXKMFLEEmdZLhblk807kXr2pJFwuXa2IOQpxuGmHsQymMZfO4W BTcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnc9AeTQDVafJxhMIK2ae5PWvccaIW4CElbsF20lg+leIKS4yo/ 91dcYAqfSvk9+44L7Af9WBm03dTcl1IhY49JyS83oPXelp0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4q/KbGTKEn4jLXiYRwB9O2lyfS4mdYypKDcujYvigfPq2hOvsjltbLikSUHGou6MbO0OZevAUOHLssyQgh2xo= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5f4b:0:b0:4a4:2240:9fad with SMTP id 11-20020ac25f4b000000b004a422409fadmr13080611lfz.481.1669754765118; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:46:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:45:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a310c805eea2137f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] More Appropriate Date/Time Exceptions From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Marcin_Brzuchalski?=) --000000000000a310c805eea2137f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Derick, wt., 29 lis 2022, 18:41 u=C5=BCytkownik Derick Rethans nap= isa=C5=82: > Hi, > > I have just published a new "More Appropriate Date/Time Exceptions" RFC > to sort out the warnings, errors, and already existing exceptions and > errors. There are a few minor BC breaks, of course listed in the RFC. > > It is published at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/datetime-exceptions > > Comments? > Sentence "This does not allow for catching Date/Time extensions as they are not specific enough." Should be exceptions instead of extensions. Also after backward incompatible changes section few sections are copied twice. In overall I like the RFC as it gives wide range of exceptions providing detailed information. Thanks. Cheers, Micha=C5=82 Marcin Brzuchalski > --000000000000a310c805eea2137f--