Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:119013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10411 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2022 13:27:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2022 13:27:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A541804F7 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f54.google.com (mail-pj1-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l6so13347907pjj.0 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:27:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ij9E8+UCUn1FpmMg6N//y9SgeF8TqE7Eiy/lJE9JYu0=; b=md1MKoSaEfxf3ycdEMrnCMeuun6nwFtAIxUkVakr1btsnBXNibVKAz/uHFukSeFegZ cZdGI/sXZPorjg0sTD0UrthhVr1LPybXTkqYEPToSyv1xHZLWMwcDTDVooNNGzMY6ZQG 0+2Uyldx1EdhgsNvte5hDkOT7CZGyV/sHrl+n8d1oAQunOZ7ehYG9BmVzb+gW+H6Ig4F V1TPQcjEcMEZ+cSjkF1+9+syVVXEyrGQZfLFsbet7QGOjdEWmfT+eGSnEpu9KGmjoMuq QMbDS2c0bBI5KK3a/jaFmP+oBMQe3MxMx7uzC7I9z7FM4zquSS1jKOkTu0vavOKc4u+2 Tczg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ij9E8+UCUn1FpmMg6N//y9SgeF8TqE7Eiy/lJE9JYu0=; b=vacWE1X6vBddnYL/Z/2OwUQBloziV/Tnpfq/jFHKtAWhOZs97YwN7DeROLfnwklycr uJXFvJj7cXEDaJiKfmBjtMZ9oimR45wdb0LxA16dYnjFLgN5XQ6aszyUC0rKCK6zfk0M eMUV0MSOhzxQ288syrCm7TSrTh6qdZD7c9GNi2IxRLO1mOkJpTZ/aj5cq9j/I7jXJIn3 OYalGI/Oy+oOq3w4ayDA7LhneL7D8HzgwjPKgCOltVQFFZXVFNp2x0MqvSe8fbTa1ouo We1MDALNgXZAwOv6VrVAUM7gd/ix0h9iEdwr/eKva/38vLwn65CB31gMkZQ4pNyLNuZA ryRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn8zhrmOqv/athe43++O/BMoxhD15i9OmI8gTNQ+h2mTjFfi4Nk C0n7uX0xKqtoQX/qu2BJaXVSLFc7DjTlbv/Nqtg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5whFFaRsOdOhVeyitGKFdsMtLODKFaY1oehQgiNGZNTy0TvReBqCVfPS5xN79UG2u4sYZglAQj81FBVyWoRtI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:268a:b0:205:e1af:68d1 with SMTP id pl10-20020a17090b268a00b00205e1af68d1mr530602pjb.121.1668518827510; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 05:27:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:26:48 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?= Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003d1ce05ed82505a" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Readonly class amendments From: drealecs@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Alexandru_P=C4=83tr=C4=83nescu?=) --00000000000003d1ce05ed82505a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mate, On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:30 AM M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Following Nicolas' thread about "Issues with readonly classes" ( > https://externals.io/message/118554), we created an RFC to fix two issues > with the readonly behavior: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_amendments > > Please let us know your thoughts! > For proposal 2 part: "Readonly properties can be reinitialized during cloning" From the details there I understand it would affect properties in a readonly class as well as explicit readonly properties in non-readonly class. Is that the intent? If yes, maybe we can share an example without a readonly class as well. Regards, Alex --00000000000003d1ce05ed82505a--