Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118976 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57342 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2022 19:48:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2022 19:48:22 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC8180382 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id c15-20020a17090a1d0f00b0021365864446so8552739pjd.4 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 11:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7xONtA0q9wxtWzTyZfm7wbYZecKPfM9PfDgvGJXlmEY=; b=HhLeszXED29oLGP3vqO5VT0YOVXe+WgqrESnFcXOyeZmmPweg5cMj49qIO74MYaLbv kvlc8B25nL6ECLoUkBsoM4i2YmNPfYwWXpP2JRsGF4uf7tOodrHzmJ4xOlm/VbTZ5YiX Swom4iVrREGKbkXcwYgASCHcD/YniTwGAsOvSULePcBR96i93zdCXU5UeCSGPARgFsBS Nu2lLdj+SAoDnfa/XH5omhU07Z5NoSfRKVkEXQtHd3ZtVwApm1eHAYdO13cUQJGCB8eA k0Rl9UU/yzBXqTz7Y0dxC4U7QJza/VRZ+EWh6vrbHiX6qRAfSqu8MHxDdWgbb19t3vGQ Grpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7xONtA0q9wxtWzTyZfm7wbYZecKPfM9PfDgvGJXlmEY=; b=GhIw425DxTLynq/YpZBzEq/7nyVRBP+nJD5wmdbY2mpH1HrctierCj+xxmHL6WLlJP 82/adMGqPxEFPKc/u/6M0hCzz9HXsct+NTPMxK4s1m1+OC7QwNKcnvvU6qdS3FW76I8n Cg5pmg2K+MahdUgw4hhBXxpuULOhyIgixo0lSo5wlhnbriEaILS5ry4Nqqi8VPE2Bo1f bpZ7svyzJtKBpsHqozdC/u61ddQwBAgXotXL8SKo6PmUSLq2hgu4ocQh8w/Rn6CqEERU 24GjXTl4DIw1cgyULZtlKId7pp3dXkf+avj1Dqx8QLvIENqtk1CzgrkDh5OjTKbzRs9q DURA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0MMTdBMVY9VVHV70IfZmNGH+ND67neXXGDVwooO2hLxBGULWGX Otec4PZ1fu5gRqksJIC1khvXkkkEqoHYgmgGJOlQqj7lk2pE9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7NRVIJHbycRqynBuDMRr7/k+ptMgnqM8KoE7qbDjX0MMKM1WShjJtxfBKdfO+baqbwdwV8k1gPSGMEiEfS7eg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4f8a:b0:213:48f0:296f with SMTP id qe10-20020a17090b4f8a00b0021348f0296fmr64660261pjb.140.1667764100294; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 11:48:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 20:48:09 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [RFC][Discussion] Arbitrary static variable initializers From: tovilo.ilija@gmail.com (Ilija Tovilo) Hi everyone I'd like to propose my next RFC. It lifts the restriction of only using constant expressions in static variable initializers. Let me know if you have any thoughts or concerns. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_static_variable_initializers Ilija