Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118961 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47185 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2022 14:31:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2022 14:31:50 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDC4180044 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:31:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id y14so13713541ejd.9 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:31:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nfuv94o+n18Nq/tuKRrVB5waAFrLXej3wpDl5YZBxJo=; b=ROs+bfMJAGXXuTdaczRFan443qI3lAdw1nKfoxU8aW11r3UtDOZ5hsy19sNoSIdVuD CUjOzPVY2EsgVPTkJJPPcJWQ4uThlQXx4gPDCJ+ZchhbCvw78+5RyDS/pz1rHS694Wpj 25Yf5o5+MJeViZQRvof3AwU5gJ9Bb8xuhsvVXdsg5zhtUTVfkczIuymXHWsR2jtnFlMQ 8bSbz2JDBU+2VGPlU2B31u7GxvgNJwVnMDpxFv35W9R+hvgzD0AJ2H5uRtQwhhwaHXWC mMfbH3gUgO34eqN27oTgyOl+1IP00Qa5oMQ2ybZSwYIcmH4TxkDvShE/HeX3cGmrJjma sOTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nfuv94o+n18Nq/tuKRrVB5waAFrLXej3wpDl5YZBxJo=; b=t845RY8YKgXOSRvLcL+hLHqI1Teq7BzMxKTIgBVHNMf9dpIAttDuY6EwW6UJjXBUSU pa4+DkQWC0/+IH0mEdruD7Le9UwwdRH/X6EBoygmD2KMsmwmqnAFYSo6ezJ3oPknR4Ez 6lQN4Ua+EQJM4GzRb0LKGDnRXSwJ6gtWxqldSFNLlYHvS2809/QJl34u3w0l8a+E5Q+x NELM1uBiHhgdMIoNq5+Kj3qAGOvwj+vVvwzkolHwhWSfbZpYc/m4Jpmm4F3n4iRmbFJO L/3LpFbrEBFKLWtTmkg2E6A9zId3U45/RiTC+g+Xy22ureFjwrnzkXXkdYG5DYjvu5gn hskw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2rETL++wfpfucUOZVfHl137ZOJqE6bj6UQUu1ievG2BRJjNjhR 4pSZ2szJWHsqHbxKSQwxep1u63ZXvBJxA3aZX1WM4naYNLW0JAX+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5sZqNJD6R8/jnvSi1zDZv1gzNvG3TkH60utIKtgdkFwInF7u8pQajeHaLcGx22q1ubJbKEz57ffgzHqZ5IDkU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:da86:b0:7ad:dc94:1b7 with SMTP id xh6-20020a170906da8600b007addc9401b7mr24650805ejb.288.1667572308247; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 07:31:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:31:36 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ilija Tovilo Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001208f905eca5efd8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Dynamic class constant fetch] From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --0000000000001208f905eca5efd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Heyo, On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 15:26, Ilija Tovilo wrote: > Hi everyone > > I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class > constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other > language constructs. This RFC aims to get rid of this seemingly > arbitrary limitation. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dynamic_class_constant_fetch > > Please let me know if you have any thoughts. > What's the problem with using `constant()` for this? Marco Pivetta https://twitter.com/Ocramius https://ocramius.github.io/ --0000000000001208f905eca5efd8--