Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118920 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77521 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2022 17:42:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2022 17:42:20 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB22618005C for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:42:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id g12so13047225wrs.10 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WSKPuHkPbGuw4EayAwy1rOfFTc//yjwoU6aElaKdAU4=; b=DyRpxf6ApESVAKjgSJqJ4Rjytk31QN5Ccsxrl8huyzupiEprBMpvAjCXoi4YeWvzps zNpzL2Jfot+cIqeshDTL8PEe+9P4lRrx6gJOUSPq1eEVDtujJ7/df+XLo2W/+mFS3nJC uuR5d/8lhJqDcs8sTu+oDTTHhCu1i4sZCY0ncLuMj4YMv/AsY4S2YKl3i6qhaZV8Ncux DP/f32MayzCz/d4bdajr7sv3C2mWRDl6NxgGDpPGNAjcfLkJabBbpQOQKj7ynuonaMbc SUtDlmQrniOjOKHMBVHJbAIqpnH5EcPyTKUSjJ/DwnDiE0mBNLe2QETx2B7aO3xhA17o XPqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WSKPuHkPbGuw4EayAwy1rOfFTc//yjwoU6aElaKdAU4=; b=sp7gZC44+g0JTjfGKYIDkpiqrrT776vFnXTIA4xiJIg5huObA0ZPO3gGIegXmsrY/7 wuH4PecFMOwnuiGAmCe4Rx10fQ5IPUhY1eyoGa5h/LpCc30qrMeNojynOwQcAVjY5NQa tfM4p1B98zmR+t45rZAaUS0X/tJhtCY2frVP3Lwo820yKEDe+WhTq3wwOJ5bfgpNxQuR DBNr8d523qXjKvcM9eguHVbg+PvrVjDrAw0Xp5QVk3zQIp1uhGgLv1Bjlgtv0K8vtIqi sy64vEcFl7Lfh0VoOKciZ0/99w7l2uNEMe9IIPWrAJX9+IsWJe0D01ZnTfiw7aroNZEf WDUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0IHWGtkc3utUu/5UH84C5hZmvT7V9j9y/XZCxZOvh1wa85LgpL nhFy7Px7VxCeP+/bOmm8yMkzWajlDxo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5YRTcdPcH4yq6N9i2WcXH1Q/oF9XNMDP1ZT1uJ16Ru2ybsIf2y8mCqXI+OdJcdM/JMJitm3g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8bc4:0:b0:236:73b7:84a with SMTP id w4-20020adf8bc4000000b0023673b7084amr5465200wra.8.1667151734206; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpc104104-brig22-2-0-cust548.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.10.58.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f28-20020a5d58fc000000b0022efc4322a9sm4724370wrd.10.2022.10.30.10.42.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46b289c4-9255-ad66-3410-46b19fc91bf6@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:42:11 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <42A5DAC6-253E-478D-808C-36690FA88315@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Microseconds to error log From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) On 30/10/2022 11:38, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > > I think the consensus is more that it needs to be configurable and I'm > in favour of configurable option as well as we should not break the > current format. In case of any confusion, I think this should be configurable as "include microseconds: on / off", not configurable as "enter date format". Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]