Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118667 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50723 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2022 22:15:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2022 22:15:36 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B8D1804A9 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f51.google.com (mail-ua1-f51.google.com [209.85.222.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f51.google.com with SMTP id u14so352102ual.3 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=V00afxrQdinw1ohqfIWZfQgMmSy/Lb1LFMuSk8haGMk=; b=V/VNv9+LuIysJVb0wdSCn3XXb7ONVRFA18A31ML8QGxOhZ2QjT9XRJ/k+R8uITaEYP uK+P1hkKk6AduRLi5T+y+y4hTld6F4wHbCzjS8dhS6VyhClz7nGGZ6t+0ZRGkdg+kVFA 6z0UQTTsYhhmnnDWZsCIC2JjEBOg2gGC++YGaXXECZsQeNhcM5VWkG8fIGGEToW/RFfj 3Apd0jN7q59S3CZj4wnBJYYzmkTld63xUzPuHUp9XW/fifs0FNn1NHgL+PnR4iP34EAS ITKwCS1yi5+hn+pXX3dmQDVem+rwgSN7mXSsJKJyHMfY2KJ3WrZmUpHxAtBb+pJXwdTP ti8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=V00afxrQdinw1ohqfIWZfQgMmSy/Lb1LFMuSk8haGMk=; b=dwM5jgqBTmdFWzThIh9eqfL9JRytNCO0OFEBTtrt5RclzfyBEUf7K4MIUNE3h633nD fP3IM1zA+egXZHU8wO//x+9zQv6Q3/gDil7HWikDcuzlfiMThSd7wD9W56oEo1ZQXi/Y q+n/8npVjYTsCM7sPNSFzgCY8V544BnkKMcvvSPPundKUCl9AZxvAMMY1bAsP4pDML5u otO7NWGzMxsoWa9lKebDFdvZEgvgKTxf7oSzLN+esdNYOeAk8R7wkBO78wq3cLv4JrOO 8+Kk2+JYV6mOJOmTIa7rNNLU3FRd9gGIjhDiZlPxLZlEUdqor4+uYc63JDVN9ewq++3n bOPA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0S4B11oAIzvcZcd9aqsGbacCaJZxksscfit2Qfq4ngWi7DQEsP UltrOVXLcMGwAPPL0MV2Twrl8u+ThJ3BvkcWT9c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7FtzF1B0NadQKe/RSgxCY7SeYUwaGOw/l96yBNpDV7Mc6lKq2do8RA4Yd2Z4UZedHK0vW5bqIhX5Gk1Eim4YI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:56c2:0:b0:374:67bd:fe1 with SMTP id c2-20020ab056c2000000b0037467bd0fe1mr7052513uab.10.1663625733646; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:15:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8ad11ab3-672d-18af-3b75-3255a0c7ac53@bastelstu.be> In-Reply-To: <8ad11ab3-672d-18af-3b75-3255a0c7ac53@bastelstu.be> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 19:15:22 -0300 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?= Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion From: dev.juan.morales@gmail.com (juan carlos morales) > The RFC still contains a non-empty "Open Issues" section. This needs to > be resolved before the vote starts. > > I would also recommend inserting a closed voting widget (or multiple, if > you want to have additional votes for the details), so that it's clear > for everyone how exactly the vote will look like. Tim, how should I proceed with the Open Issues/Questions? is only about the return value of the function. Should I create a poll for that? Should I leave it like this and decide during Voting phase? This question raised during the mailing discussion and never moved forward, can you advice please? Or I should delete the Open Issues/question and move forward with the current approach I choosed? A lot of days passed by already, and I would like to move on with the RFC process. Thanks in advance.