Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118542 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41074 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2022 15:01:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2022 15:01:09 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABDC1804A9; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS8560 212.227.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1661871661; bh=rDTkUfR40CsrYtnVyJtxeJlWvbfbhyUEQJZzBqf4Ans=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=VUVFzTjTCbzz61RloFIZiyAegx960/YD7g9zVohc3Jl7WYhY5+xGD//lM0s18LgPR pPnkV43LG2kMj70jy98w0yVtIZNPEXGedIKL6/gvLIMYrz6r6JFXyWIBjNJdj6Qmg/ DeX+36MUZNTAQb+r4W1mvs4WsudYT+F4Ko2D/bMY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.130] ([79.220.93.232]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWzfl-1ovyg02naD-00XOiZ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1b4b0fa4-2840-bfde-7823-d745853fa171@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:01:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Content-Language: de-DE To: Ben Ramsey Cc: Sara Golemon , Patrick ALLAERT , Go Kudo , PHP internals , Gabriel Caruso References: <355260c3-880f-a497-698f-c12175192485@gmx.de> <47B19B34-6BBA-4B2F-BDEA-1F5B7036548A@php.net> In-Reply-To: <47B19B34-6BBA-4B2F-BDEA-1F5B7036548A@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:seMm4mDKgCxpdNOCq9PtCykpd0ZaszMlbc8Pw+MpxfJn0ENfsnO D3hXmxoX6vPB8n8EA6Nn7VeyqUIriT7BoOBVfZCQ/vr6uBgX9BDOOKeOTwwJs/ic94audjM fCqPuzPem4r3fyESb9o1e+c3EU14rLXgzYSA2Dy0j3ELJNebfNwzve3OCgc6qkrS6pU/Yyq ejC9pibjNrrcZ4YVFLpRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+9ZsNLRyIOM=:2KLq+66ATCQJfglliqanby qkStn62hh1ikiqdTSLvbGRbTF0tmyu0IXYUkdGckhnvMYMLXWAF5I2ak1OUD39FIP1ZpkRJfa b4G7LV/yStCiwfcbr8QZNLV75oQeOsiRfJlE/KSqzVDal2sUylCFn9KAe3E/jmQaJNL7AQnLx 6QdkgJyFOqc1Q22gOH8fFnmhyiefeX/5FOHEtS3sgoGfg664X8p/Wxg8d3jOQgRPrHcvav0x7 5DmvfVtAz60mYuPumHKCv1Z7aAZ3HrVM1MIA2sFtytGqjd/tcKpPjrpbwfdeDks7CSe0lKJD3 DOCtr3avrR+8y0jihw3rW9ZOOu7cUvye7rj13atxWJ32z5wFrD+WCVnnA8ScSc5eUWRbcAoPl hgDU+dmzI8fpgIjA9H+gcXUenOJtMtn/DY5ZHzll19mfP5dkas7VSw5vGtPoXRGjvdDSMzu+8 TBgwT8p31VB7MrYKoUlLtz77FuL1UdmiorItMyD5Yiw7zdbvqF7LtY9QZ1pf3/CGz7Tqy18CV eVVH7wwcUKUbv9X2QzU9sizwIYrMGvZPZdQGa90UKUjSIAcq2OCFebZxe/OpMAo1r5ikmFWxF rYF81xzaWuoBV9UGpehGi1+stvHIHv35kLLQx/5jWB8KXfIgnCOlMBgT186lIt9sGEEkHM/7k Pv/NUrC1iQ/K/x3CVs0I13lvyfHfkU2NW+m9PVVopYNg08mFGHAfmKOBgKrsKl19oLQyYdbWr pRF9+WelQ37u4ykgj+znJdfth5KKMETVYQNzJbI4aNrPEpB6rv7JRrUTBM8B7V1zJ3s7f4OAo ZVg6Zc8NZh6O9PrHkjLT6VfgVCQF5QYAJtKKA34TbRI6XImIzUccAwo+94gzgNUGgahlx+Ohj xbqSx+/K1/Qc9+HTT0PDWtnSirEDmGXaKU+SapaOx+OoTPw8VnreGZEuZecRwzAuLR1LwP1ic kS9Oc7lwoB7VIsvzDB2Ko2SVIlGL+0H2SifJDDFdosUf1C47faAkNbenPrRuEOj7F3Z4s5rmo Pcd7bKkodKh+MRZY6r4NV7/rXVGvtg6/jDfwjuOYQFrbtX3R6Y5hX8GTs/LvAaUPe56pJPz3l U4WY+uTpWmNMOZGWUjuNOaoV2z7uHapmnjmeAFtpANa1NDUF/wZy8mpDhSWGuF6eqL1PFMErC 2vBvw+whdxlA/YAncNxCtvWplC Subject: Re: ksort breaking change From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 30.08.2022 at 16:25, Ben Ramsey wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2022, at 05:48, Christoph M. Becker wrot= e: >> >> On 26.08.2022 at 18:28, Sara Golemon wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:19 AM Christoph M. Becker >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 26.08.2022 at 05:15, Go Kudo wrote: >>>> >>>>> In the actively supported version of PHP, `ksort()` has been modifie= d to >>>>> include BC Break. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/9296 >>>>> >>>>> This may seem like an appropriate bug fix, but it is a clear BC Brea= k. I >>>>> think this change should only be introduced in PHP 8.2 and later. >>>> >>>> In this case, the functions didn't behave as documented, namely to >>>> conform to the general conversion rules, which had a relevant change = in >>>> PHP 8.0. Apparently, this case has been overlooked when the change h= ad >>>> been implemented, and only been noticed recently (what still surprise= s >>>> me). Anyway, fixing the issue now is not really introducing a BC bre= ak, >>>> since code relying on the previous behavior did not conform to the >>>> documentation. >>> >>> What I can see is two noble, but conflicting ideals: >>> 1/ sort() and ksort() should be consistent about their sorting algorit= hms. >>> I think we can all agree about that in the ideal case, at least. >>> 2/ Behavior within a minor release should be self-consistent and >>> predictable. >>> >>> Knowing the discrepancy exists in current releases of 8.0.x and 8.1.x, >>> we're currently in a position where ideal #2 is satisfied, but ideal #= 1 is >>> failing in a small, and subtle way. The potential consequence of this= is >>> sites out there where the inconsistency shows through to end users (th= ough >>> I wouldn't actually expect any breakages as a result, just clowniness)= . >>> >>> With the recently applied patch, we would resolve ideal #1, but we wou= ld do >>> so at the cost of ideal #2. It's doubtful this will actually break an= y >>> code either, but potentially user-facing affects could be visible, >>> especially in a mixed-version environment (such as during a rolling >>> upgrade). >>> >>> Given the above, my initial inclination is to err on the side of >>> conservatism for 8.0.x at the least (we're nearly at the end of our pr= imary >>> bug-fix cycle anyway) by reverting the fix on our branch. >>> For 8.1, I think we have a more difficult decision to make with over a= year >>> of bug-fix releases to go, and I might be swayed to keep the fix aroun= d >>> there. >> >> I have reverted the commit on PHP-8.0 just now. Please don't forget to >> revert on PHP-8.0.23. >> >>>>> Fortunately, there is not yet a release in each version that >>> incorporates >>>>> this change. I think it is possible to revert now. >>>> >>>> Well, the fix is part of the currents RCs; that doesn't make it >>>> impossible to revert, but RMs should have a say in that. Thus I'm >>>> adding Sara and Gabriel as recepients. >>> >>> Don't forget Ben and Patrick as well, this impacts 8.1 equally. >> >> Yeah, would be good to hear whether the commit should be reverted on >> PHP-8.1 as well. > > I decided to revert this in PHP-8.1 and PHP-8.1.10 branches, as well. Thank you! A PR for the documentation is welcome. =2D- Christoph M. Becker