Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118495
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANMwmbN8_Km+urXbNO7oWvNteYA2mTPNYyRgfaoypEK1Cw4F0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+p1FaZDm3-h_LoOwv619wFyPg+2pAM8qC2La438sU_SPHZnCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABdc3WqsDc+80ATdX9+qstOkf+eUYCAQNPeV_FXcHiFumVQb8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <8D53AD5B-7CFC-4820-9EE4-FEB365D327A8@woofle.net> <CABdc3Wo7_qJOtebvA2GNGFUGFAut3tJOShXDBLHnRKqhrwVJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANMwmbMLbY=i7it+R++D3qTni3-aBoxdyNWWVVdpXYiucm7VTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANMwmbMLbY=i7it+R++D3qTni3-aBoxdyNWWVVdpXYiucm7VTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:35:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CABdc3WpHuQExCRSqCnbp9cYxAh1CO-VakP1RPBHhbJ8Ogts93A@mail.gmail.com>
To: juan carlos morales <dev.juan.morales@gmail.com>
Cc: Dusk <dusk@woofle.net>, David Gebler <davidgebler@gmail.com>, 
	PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion
From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Marcin_Brzuchalski?=)

--00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Juan,

pt., 26 sie 2022 o 11:26 juan carlos morales <dev.juan.morales@gmail.com>
napisa=C5=82(a):

> El vie, 26 ago 2022 a las 11:00, Micha=C5=82 Marcin Brzuchalski
> (<michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com>) escribi=C3=B3:
> >
> > A `json_decode()` is a substitute that IMO solves 99% of use cases.
> > If I'd follow your logic and accept every small addition that handles 1=
%
> of use cases, somebody will raise another RFC
> > for simplexml_validate_string or yaml_validate and the next
> PhpToken::validate.
> > All above can be valid if we trust that people normally validate 300MB
> payloads to do nothing if they DON'T fail and there is nothing strange
> about that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
>
> How can you make such an assertion in those numbers (99% of use cases
> and son on, that you mention) ? Can you give us more information about
> this assertions?
>
> I have provide real examples where the need to validate-only a
> json-string is actually needed, also the need from our developers
> community asking for this.
>

Your examples are a couple of functions.
Assuming that they're heavily used is as true as my assumptions.

Cheers,

--00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1--