Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118495
Return-Path: <michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 52447 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2022 09:35:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2022 09:35:45 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EBA1804A9
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 02:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ua1-f47.google.com (mail-ua1-f47.google.com [209.85.222.47])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 02:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f47.google.com with SMTP id q21so358062uam.13
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 02:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc;
        bh=85KUFYPlVJqNGaE6qhldcqclDljjJeljtRRt/2SspAk=;
        b=dCnSa8+Bak5ayEGTUUDU3AGdBBFDcSwxahrgJviQXz1rDlazPUF+ZHjRWNoRH1tzvA
         Vwfsljjwnm2mPdGwchrbrslcSQ01AZKGw9N+Yl/w7aDuG3Y4oSzfhoKOmL6xsDI+/Z35
         SW4yEy+AuLQjJpYC5Ptknz2Qu2h2EAG0QsiX2usHHPgp+YPl88AbJhMhiRu2UBPjgQ2o
         CnoXNe9fcwMnjj5dN76TKwAAslFXPP1cNzrW/R6b6acyXC8uZNg+6/NSGTcDL9JpcWfn
         IebLFbxJ1fX6eirTwz2QsVavE8SEa2QRpMB35NlOZDAoidjOKmgvbk+b+4hsw7YRfFkQ
         auNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc;
        bh=85KUFYPlVJqNGaE6qhldcqclDljjJeljtRRt/2SspAk=;
        b=pkr+Ne1UM4rGsKoyBmEEK7vLb5y72f9khQ8RRluywX83AJstDxgVkWRfyKik6LN9Dx
         ZDUhG3Q4clMyCw14smyP418XPUrqHANeAv35wkJNJv55EU3VmPL8b+E1Ed+JtacvICpz
         ijd2afyDhuaftR6Ffp2AI5fcPZvM0A48/BVulAGoM0iA9Zh6ophaQxXodzpulxAl06qM
         rIzjsj7asnBp1maiL7AaoODejz+fxawuDDGBxWCeBBCJHolG5wh6myxwCzpeOVnlQKYu
         KDbsGJXdVSPSsMpnmlL0gCPrUJnb4QWmKIl4Lei0ch3YcbqqeflngEroZxSFyzCAeLWS
         mxxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo04C9nXhGo41S5/bSmAMKCXUcnxWqojQIKzEoEfZv/Ng9ubMuJj
	HqkBp1u2gN/E3ME1XMOxGACvJjznL+UnTRzZmr8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6EIpehe6ROtqm79awiIUefEvxNcYhajsGzcl4rD9+d37wBne1EyLJuGQg59XEdiNQCsCJykj5gUYpqkw4YiRE=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6609:0:b0:39f:64d0:2b6d with SMTP id
 r9-20020ab06609000000b0039f64d02b6dmr930498uam.16.1661506544773; Fri, 26 Aug
 2022 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANMwmbN8_Km+urXbNO7oWvNteYA2mTPNYyRgfaoypEK1Cw4F0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+p1FaZDm3-h_LoOwv619wFyPg+2pAM8qC2La438sU_SPHZnCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABdc3WqsDc+80ATdX9+qstOkf+eUYCAQNPeV_FXcHiFumVQb8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <8D53AD5B-7CFC-4820-9EE4-FEB365D327A8@woofle.net> <CABdc3Wo7_qJOtebvA2GNGFUGFAut3tJOShXDBLHnRKqhrwVJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANMwmbMLbY=i7it+R++D3qTni3-aBoxdyNWWVVdpXYiucm7VTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANMwmbMLbY=i7it+R++D3qTni3-aBoxdyNWWVVdpXYiucm7VTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:35:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CABdc3WpHuQExCRSqCnbp9cYxAh1CO-VakP1RPBHhbJ8Ogts93A@mail.gmail.com>
To: juan carlos morales <dev.juan.morales@gmail.com>
Cc: Dusk <dusk@woofle.net>, David Gebler <davidgebler@gmail.com>, 
	PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion
From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Marcin_Brzuchalski?=)

--00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Juan,

pt., 26 sie 2022 o 11:26 juan carlos morales <dev.juan.morales@gmail.com>
napisa=C5=82(a):

> El vie, 26 ago 2022 a las 11:00, Micha=C5=82 Marcin Brzuchalski
> (<michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com>) escribi=C3=B3:
> >
> > A `json_decode()` is a substitute that IMO solves 99% of use cases.
> > If I'd follow your logic and accept every small addition that handles 1=
%
> of use cases, somebody will raise another RFC
> > for simplexml_validate_string or yaml_validate and the next
> PhpToken::validate.
> > All above can be valid if we trust that people normally validate 300MB
> payloads to do nothing if they DON'T fail and there is nothing strange
> about that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
>
> How can you make such an assertion in those numbers (99% of use cases
> and son on, that you mention) ? Can you give us more information about
> this assertions?
>
> I have provide real examples where the need to validate-only a
> json-string is actually needed, also the need from our developers
> community asking for this.
>

Your examples are a couple of functions.
Assuming that they're heavily used is as true as my assumptions.

Cheers,

--00000000000064ae5105e721a3c1--