Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118488
Return-Path: <paul.crovella@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 40839 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2022 08:56:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2022 08:56:31 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:56:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.0
References: <CANMwmbN8_Km+urXbNO7oWvNteYA2mTPNYyRgfaoypEK1Cw4F0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJvSBVPF12zMwm6vavLz_Zv06_m+DVdkkVLbKeG_NPKnN07cgw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <CAJvSBVPF12zMwm6vavLz_Zv06_m+DVdkkVLbKeG_NPKnN07cgw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Posted-By: 172.113.137.202
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion
From: paul.crovella@gmail.com (Paul Crovella)
Message-ID: <php.internals-118488@news.php.net>

On 8/26/2022 1:28 AM, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> 
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 17:02, juan carlos morales <
> dev.juan.morales@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_validate
> 
> 
> Thanks for bringing forward this RFC. I am in favour of this change, as you
> can't efficiently validate JSON in userland.
> 
> Like Rowan I'm not convinced JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR belongs here. I can't
> think of a case where more than a boolean response is needed.
> 
> Peter
> 


I'm for this as well. Though something more than a boolean is useful to 
indicate when the max depth has been exceeded as that's not strictly a 
problem with the json's validity.