Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118487 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37976 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2022 08:28:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2022 08:28:50 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5126180505 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (mail-qk1-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id g21so612158qka.5 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=zTtZ0lS8laG7940wX9k6I24gV8WVWZ+CTUTzMOL+maA=; b=PmkPJ7HMcycBrCZAsLO9Tnn2M66AsRzMMLBn7vuk5uQvp+F4lDF7HLVIBpnfr8qHBe y+obDgaH/QS+5O5sEuzyWF2oRDXOZ5Yru9uw570wD1aS0W0lw2h8l4sQtg9CwiKtns0x YSHwgawFtlMuZC9VP/ilMe4WSB5hC2b4cjNFeU1FUaH31GL/z1erGQcNJa7B7HVknRlS ZOwAV9/7vcZNVSdNMpHpI6rq1qwSd5KopHq/gMDxwJ8HJqfACrOnYIHO36au2HgXKTQb NbovLhpqZZbK/SoWdJlJE87cADXjeMa0afsi7RZiOLP7mQW7Osxml+VDIo/Ouu67QYj+ tHEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=zTtZ0lS8laG7940wX9k6I24gV8WVWZ+CTUTzMOL+maA=; b=vqSYhGJtN68sQyHt56FA36EaTXNM+s0B/2+0Xh5vWi0QkSRHLESzvScC/kz6SLyED4 srZAAMgSynOEteH4C0wMG1xdZ40/Gtij4g99iHCCI6WI+8+bIUpzk4YnKGjKxsd/Ts2A 1ZACYQc5b+TpgZhXNSJYpnBdqgTEbcOiDNUfZnImj+oWrRmnfoq3FmUl/A4ha741Inkb 8hd515OzFv1U+x4hn85IBeVZoi0ecMZrIkluN41ei/75KNfJQuDbAlpyq3jHPI4Vz7no sme3OIGi80JFHiiN0loj+Q0ImREBRoHM9y/UGWIEvpmNmVjwOfNhkUrUHO0HZAXPS4ns sO2w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2W7267jGYfl8JJwjAWE+cCUIcX37BPfpCn4KYj2+ePI3ZUB8U8 ABLU7vK2zgyzfxlGbdPExkixYOk6a6k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6y5476LtbmMP1/bCYtthZZ2Zh5McuVElNPUYmLARZYDkKHUMBmVg/aaS8sx8BpNDJeQmjQDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2681:b0:6b5:b50c:99c0 with SMTP id c1-20020a05620a268100b006b5b50c99c0mr5610025qkp.527.1661502528595; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw1-f171.google.com (mail-yw1-f171.google.com. [209.85.128.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15-20020ac86b8f000000b0034355bb11f2sm866424qts.10.2022.08.26.01.28.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-33dce2d4bc8so18703667b3.4 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:601:b0:696:42b8:670 with SMTP id d1-20020a056902060100b0069642b80670mr5249253ybt.298.1661502527975; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 01:28:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:28:12 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: juan carlos morales Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f9472805e720b316" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --000000000000f9472805e720b316 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Juan, On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 17:02, juan carlos morales < dev.juan.morales@gmail.com> wrote: > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_validate Thanks for bringing forward this RFC. I am in favour of this change, as you can't efficiently validate JSON in userland. Like Rowan I'm not convinced JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR belongs here. I can't think of a case where more than a boolean response is needed. Peter --000000000000f9472805e720b316--