Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118341 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6945 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2022 18:48:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2022 18:48:32 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF990180003 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so6480063ljq.3 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=k+VSGQ3Pa345uGDBX3qoXsvaohwYq0dPvaktHgRN7dc=; b=kLuyclpaJzskvdv0kJJMNk1M2eC8rRrf7jPk6nLrfp1PC9x34/1e6WGFd+5NlfOj3U 9Z5veYwEmXhiYFEOte4N4o1elLQ9Gr25E41D7XTqX76QIoPli2FwbqBJSF4kBng84nMZ o1PEYSBclmHHySnW+No7FLPP2ANgw4jCOtpV6M6Ez2aI1PSc4YNUMKG8BMLBUyYy+PDL GydzzPV+zQoedkbxTdliV78B6YQtb4RBG/iSInorMl7UIeb0TZjQBCcFcQzKVda/V1+p LBTWR9Rdr9ooRgZPGe6lIc/m3vb5JreJUNFkF9NwwSm9uG6cOfzzs7ng7TiUTqBEuMLh etGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=k+VSGQ3Pa345uGDBX3qoXsvaohwYq0dPvaktHgRN7dc=; b=NfgjXFtoVn+Rbc6IYnLAD179z5qZRm3TGi+jLO219+VVWIeVLV1r5WHAosLfXMocUm +FmhAZo8AOfsKRRbqPFfhX1uUUIw3LSGGsxWuLmwoZ439Wo6zPXnAwF4JL9L/Wf8BJ3T kIeMuhBs+qDOtQ2GJ4F4rjmRxtmReB9R2kfyDi3AjOqSrKBzQzUKFRpHQvGq17ItlnjR 60hbZLtuRI+rFVSd35bL9uPXq8DJrfleKuaYzx3fUtMsVn7bllz1sIu/ZbHEouQnlE6i 8txiZZsM48m6MEXLblMyXJoVAv8APCKjmBnoupEBcn4CvZEGaSY142VrGeunZY4+U7zd h7Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8qySR1BK0KCGd7YRUuhch9Uxkp6tf5lHZUg/MVZCWKipCbAt06 cZJyQ3fhIDSd/PjgYGHDbJl75hNruQC8pTUCXyRY+oAisq8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uVDRt9g+RxR8fORGotw61yqt10vegxsC/Gif5jJ911AZucEENXdNZYtUXiGCWxRfaqFBh0to3qWsJNWGOx33Y= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b983:0:b0:25e:887:3fc5 with SMTP id p3-20020a2eb983000000b0025e08873fc5mr5287584ljp.64.1659386886195; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:48:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:47:53 -0300 Message-ID: Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e58dca05e5341d6c" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] array_merge() vs array unpacking performance From: david.proweb@gmail.com (David Rodrigues) --000000000000e58dca05e5341d6c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > There are already a number of optimizations in array_merge. It might depend on the actual test data that you used. Maybe a specific path needs to be optimized. Please provide some more details. You are right. I do not know how I tested before, but actually, array_merge() is bit faster than array unpacking. Atenciosamente, David Rodrigues Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 =C3=A0s 14:45, Kamil Tekiela escreveu: > Hi David, > > It would be useful if you could provide your measurements and the way you > arrived at such results. A quick test doesn't seem to support your > findings: https://3v4l.org/v5m9f#v8.1.8 > > There are already a number of optimizations in array_merge. It might > depend on the actual test data that you used. Maybe a specific path needs > to be optimized. Please provide some more details. > > Regards, > Kamil > --000000000000e58dca05e5341d6c--