Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118223 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45186 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2022 03:56:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2022 03:56:24 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA18180384 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 22:49:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS20694 188.94.24.0/21 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from scarlet.netpirates.net (scarlet.netpirates.net [188.94.27.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 22:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tmo-114-238.customers.d1-online.com ([80.187.114.238] helo=[IPV6:2a01:598:a130:5990:ce21:a9bc:bf5a:5f0d]) by scarlet.netpirates.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9gs9-001l3c-LR for internals@lists.php.net; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83cbd45e-5dfe-bffb-9e17-ece0d1850de8@php.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:49:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Constants in traits From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) On 7/6/22 11:45, Marco Pivetta wrote: > I don't want traits to expand in scope I voted NO for this exact reason. > From a technical and detail PoV, your RFC is well written and implemented: > it just solves a problem that doesn't/shouldn't need solving. Agreed!