Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118203 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75740 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2022 03:14:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2022 03:14:08 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA81804B3 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:07:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-yb1-f174.google.com (mail-yb1-f174.google.com [209.85.219.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id e69so18909802ybh.2 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 22:07:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colopl.co.jp; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Jo/zJwLnjzYbfFODBMIvSEWijlmAfRv6sGECmshCU6k=; b=WYFR73s4vyryWlRzaOo+OIDKQNF3y9kUxhDCDvORoc/xz4YF+K1Oaf8Mmx4ry3mYlP ij0LJPBuoBQ8QZzNj2koVj/aWKQEDMyoYmU2JulwhZSj0C/zWW0wf5KMhYRVbADCEzDt mrW8Kd0smDj4jL+0IFr0AD5Y4lipz5IEnc67Ozmgv++mhIrMSYHrqaClIZfdVrvaLFlU Kl5F/PurUDFHni7gTp8PZ4sffApVX/9lUZB4TrggHlxF0HipYoEGOFSngAVbB1UI42PX 0zcsKUGEAC8USAh2h6fCRbvC5Ni+0FRD0v2Kwv9Z73izFBzUEQ+yZcNa27ZPy2yWFUm9 YeIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Jo/zJwLnjzYbfFODBMIvSEWijlmAfRv6sGECmshCU6k=; b=FHwxnAYr06WWgPgSwIh+XJEAxySDZ58ezNDTWPW4PaGN4xzJX7bJT0bDlMgPdbfnfA z3gk7aKctuVQoDhXYh8dDVkwl1rdkzQlcvUnhk1rhHhm6MlF0/xmvAg5WEwjs2lg1+UT soiNijiT7jV6Km8K0NtavPI7fLcAgXePY/8sJRDSCF1WVch39ck+9TcKy0ER3pEM3YRL W6dLqcDbKe0S5lL3k/tX3aSdyAPlQ5cL9A4AFHbk9Eidt2VSOIJPCXDWs+WlcpX/py3i jfBQS1EFFiQpz3tekVOlUfk+BE/lAEMP6+00IoBr/rvztBGmJOXRIMDzabfdi0wzWc9k E5zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8hEZlHcT0dw3UU8S5mrK0r4XM7pSyOCqbeBRj1r52lk+LwPK5z R+xgYaJ373bhJct+8lx1v703ixAnBkUqhzicrZee X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tTi3/l6JHA0qf7sNm4xppBfNhbV0raAwCSwyiVNE/88R6KM/dUYoI60aQVYLsycMx+eKwicBG+3OhzN0Au8yA= X-Received: by 2002:a25:6c09:0:b0:66c:f556:2472 with SMTP id h9-20020a256c09000000b0066cf5562472mr39279041ybc.566.1657084022748; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 22:07:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:06:51 +0900 Message-ID: To: Go Kudo , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008a0c3005e31bf0e9" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Random Extension Improvement From: g-kudo@colopl.co.jp (Go Kudo) --0000000000008a0c3005e31bf0e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2022=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=883=E6=97=A5(=E6=97=A5) 12:00 Go Kudo : > Hello internals. > > Voting began on 2022-07-02 03:00:00 (UTC) and will end on 2022-07-16 > 03:00:00 (UTC). > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random_extension_improvement > > Best Regards, > Go Kudo > Hi. Once again, I apologize for the delay in starting the voting due to various reasons. One point, the RFC Status was still Under Discussion, which has been corrected. No other changes have been made to the text. I will be able to resume work today and will continue implementation and refactoring with PHP 8.2 in mind. P.S. > Add Randomizer::pickArrayKeys(array $array, int $num): array method This seems to be relatively unpopular, and I would like to know the reasons for those who voted No. Is it because this function, like array_rand, is overly complex in its behavior? Regards, Go Kudo --0000000000008a0c3005e31bf0e9--